Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32245882›Full record

SynthesisHeart (British Cardiac Society)2020

Safety and efficacy of the European Society of Cardiology 0/1-hour algorithm for diagnosis of myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cho-Han Chiang, Cho-Hung Chiang, Gin Hoong Lee, Weng-Tein Gi, Yuan-Kun Wu, Sih-Shiang Huang, Yee Hui Yeo, Evangelos Giannitsis, Chien-Chang Lee

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04739267 (The Acute Coronary Syndrome Accelerated CardioFlux TM Magnetocardiography-based Early Disposition Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04739267 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Acute Coronary Syndrome Accelerated CardioFlux TM Magnetocardiography-based Early Disposition Study

TypeobservationalSponsorGenetesis Inc.Ran2021 to 2023Enrolled390ConditionsAcute Myocardial InjuriesArmsCardioFlux
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. How Close Are We to Patient-Side Troponin Testing?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cho-Han Chiang *Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cho-Hung Chiang *Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Gin Hoong Lee *Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Weng-Tein GiDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Yuan-Kun WuDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sih-Shiang HuangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yee Hui YeoDivision of General Internal Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Evangelos GiannitsisDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Chien-Chang LeeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan cclee100@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1243-2463

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1 hour algorithm has been primarily validated in Europe, America and Australasia with less knowledge of its performance outside of these settings. We aim to evaluate the performance of the ESC 0/1 hour algorithm across different contexts.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant studies published between 1 January 2008 and 31 May 2019. The primary outcome was index myocardial infarction and the secondary outcome was major adverse cardiac event or mortality. A bivariate random-effects meta-analysis was used to derive the pooled estimate of each outcome.

resultsA total of 11 014 patients from 10 cohorts were analysed for the primary outcome. The algorithm based on high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn)T (Roche), hs-cTnI (Abbott) and hs-cTnI (Siemens) had pooled sensitivity of 98.4% (95% CI=95.1% to 99.5%), 98.1% (95% CI=94.6% to 99.3%) and 98.7% (95% CI=97.3% to 99.3%), respectively. The algorithm based on hs-cTnT (Roche) and hs-cTnI (Siemens) had pooled specificity of 91.2% (95% CI=86.0% to 94.6%) and 95.9% (95% CI=94.1% to 97.2%), respectively. Among patients in the rule-out category, the pooled mortality rate at 30 days and at 1 year was 0.1% (95% CI=0.0% to 0.4%) and 0.8% (95% CI=0.5% to 1.2%), respectively. Among patients in the observation zone, the pooled mortality rate was 0.7% (95% CI=0.3% to 1.2%) at 30 days but increased to 8.1% (95% CI=6.1% to 10.4%) at 1 year, comparable to the mortality rate in the rule-in group.

conclusionThe ESC 0/1 hour algorithm has high diagnostic accuracy but may not be sufficiently safe if the 1% miss-rate for myocardial infarction is desired. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019142280.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsClinical Decision RulesAgedBiomarkersClinical Decision-MakingFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRisk AssessmentTime FactorsTroponin IBiomarkersTroponin ITroponin Tacute coronary syndromesacute myocardial infarction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.