Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32245483›Full record

Observational studyHealth and quality of life outcomes2020

Quality of life after total laryngectomy: impact of different vocal rehabilitation methods in a middle income country.

F G R Souza, I C Santos, A Bergmann, L C S Thuler, A S Freitas, E Q Freitas, F L Dias

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Survival analysis of laryngeal squamous cell cancer, considering different treatment modalities and other factors influencing survival - a monocentric retrospective investigation.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F G R SouzaResearcher Psychologist from Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, INCA, Praça da Cruz Vermelha, 23, Rio de Janeiro, 20230-130, Brazil. nandars@hotmail.com.
I C SantosHead and Neck Surgeon from the Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
A BergmannClinical Research and Technology Incorporation Coordination, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
L C S ThulerClinical Research and Technology Incorporation Coordination, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
A S FreitasSpeech-Language Pathologist from Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
E Q FreitasHead and Neck Surgeon from the Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
F L DiasHead and Neck Surgeon from the Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Instituto Nacional do Câncer · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe impact of advanced laryngeal cancer and its extensive surgical treatments cause significant morbidity for these patients. Total laryngectomy impacts essential functions such as breathing, communication and swallowing, and may influence the quality of life as well as affecting the social life of laryngeal cancer patients.

objectiveDescribe the quality of life and analyze the factors associated with the reduced quality of life in patients who have undergone total laryngectomy.

methodObservational cross-sectional study was carried out to evaluate the quality of life of patients who had undergone total laryngectomy due to laryngeal cancer. The fourth version of the UW-QOL Quality of Life Assessment Questionnaire from Washington University, validated for Portuguese, was used.

resultsThe study population was 95 patients, and the mean composite score of the QOL was 80.4. In the subjective domains the majority of the patients (38.9%) reported they felt much better at present compared to the month before being diagnosed with cancer. When questioned about how they evaluated their health-related quality of life, there was a predominance of those who considered it good (43.2%), and most considered they had a good quality of life (46.3%) considering personal well-being. The overall quality of life was considered good to excellent by 83.2% of the patients. Patients with tracheoesophageal prosthesis reported a better quality of life, compared to patients using an electrolarynx or esophageal voice.

conclusionThe high mean value of the composite score for quality of life revealed that the patients assessed their quality of life positively. The absence of vocal emission was the only variable associated with a lower quality of life within the composite score according to the UW-QOL questionnaire.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAgedBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLaryngeal NeoplasmsLaryngectomyMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesHead and neck cancerHealth-related quality of lifeUW-QOL

Identifiers

PMID32245483
PMCPMC7126368
OpenAlexW3014098373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.