Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32245442›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

How can we support best practice? A situational assessment of injury prevention practice in public health.

Sarah A Richmond, Sarah Carsley, Rachel Prowse, Heather Manson, Brent Moloughney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah A RichmondApplied Public Health Science Unit, Health Promotion, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Public Health Ontario, 480 University Ave, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V2, Canada. sarah.richmond@oahpp.ca.
Sarah CarsleyApplied Public Health Science Unit, Health Promotion, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Public Health Ontario, 480 University Ave, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V2, Canada.
Rachel ProwseApplied Public Health Science Unit, Health Promotion, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Public Health Ontario, 480 University Ave, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V2, Canada.
Heather MansonHealth Promotion, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Brent MoloughneyHealth Promotion, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo effectively impact the significant population burden of injury, we completed a situational assessment of injury prevention practice within a provincial public health system to identify system-wide priorities for capacity-building to advance injury prevention in public health.

methodsA descriptive qualitative study was used to collect data on the current practice, challenges and needs of support for injury prevention. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews (n = 20) and focus groups (n = 19). Participants included a cross-section of injury prevention practitioners and leadership from public health units reflecting different population sizes and geographic characteristics, in addition to public health researchers and experts from academia, public health and not-for-profit organizations. Thematic analysis was used to code all of the data by one reviewer, followed by a second independent reviewer who coded a random selection of interview notes. Major codes and sub codes were identified and final themes were decided through iterations of coding comparisons and categorization. Once data were analysed, we confirmed the findings with the field, in addition to participating in a prioritization exercise to surface the top three needs for support.

resultsMajor themes that were identified from the data included: current public health practice challenges; capacity and resource constraints, and; injury as a low priority area. Overall, injury prevention is a broad, complex topic that competes with other areas of public health. Best practices are challenged by system-wide factors related to resources, direction, coordination, collaboration, and emerging injury public health issues. Injury is a reportedly under prioritized and under resourced public health area of practice. Practitioners believe that increasing access to data and evidence, and improving collaboration and networking is required to promote best practice.

conclusionsThe results of this study suggest that there are several system level needs to support best practice in public health injury prevention in Ontario including reducing research to practice gaps and supporting opportunities for collaboration. Our research contributes to the literature of the complexity of public health practice, and presents several mechanisms of support to increase capacity at a system level to improve injury prevention practice, and eventually lessen the population burden of injury.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingCapacity BuildingCross-Sectional StudiesFocus GroupsHumansLeadershipOntarioPractice Guidelines as TopicPublic Health PracticeQualitative ResearchWounds and InjuriesBest practiceCapacity buildingInjury preventionPublic healthSituational assessment

Identifiers

PMID32245442
PMCPMC7119282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.