Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32245036›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Effects of Alternative Administration Programs of a Synbiotic Supplement on Broiler Performance, Foot Pad Dermatitis, Caecal Microbiota, and Blood Metabolites.

Giorgio Brugaletta, Alessandra De Cesare, Marco Zampiga, Luca Laghi, Chiara Oliveri, Chenglin Zhu, Gerardo Manfreda, Basharat Syed, Luis Valenzuela, Federico Sirri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Protective Effect of Synbiotic Supplementation AgainstAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Impact of Dietary or Drinking WaterFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Giorgio BrugalettaDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, 40064 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1347-6222
Alessandra De CesareDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, 40064 Bologna, Italy.
Marco ZampigaDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, 40064 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8074-7283
Luca LaghiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, 40064 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1593-7376
Chiara OliveriDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, 40064 Bologna, Italy.
Chenglin ZhuDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, 40064 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3486-1936
Gerardo ManfredaDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, 40064 Bologna, Italy.
Basharat SyedBiomin Holding, 3131 Getzersdorf, Austria.
Luis ValenzuelaBiomin Holding, 3131 Getzersdorf, Austria.
Federico SirriDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, 40064 Bologna, Italy.

Funding

Emilia-Romagna Rural Development Programme 2014-2020 : Operazione 16.2.01, Focus Area 3A - Progetti di filiera, Avviso D.G.R. N. 227 del 27/02/201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research investigated the effects of different synbiotic administration programs on broiler productive performance and foot pad dermatitis (FPD). Molecular insights on caecal microbiota and plasma metabolomics were also performed. - A total of 1000 one-day-old male chicks were grouped by the synbiotic treatment. The synbiotic was either sprayed as gel droplets onto newly hatched chicks at the hatchery (100 g/10,000 birds) or supplemented in-feed during the entire rearing period (1000, 500, and 250 g/ton according to feeding phase), or both. Only the treatments' combination produced significant results in comparison with the control group (untreated), improving feed conversion ratio from 14 to 29 d and in the overall period of the trial (1.570 vs. 1.509 and 1.643 vs. 1.596, respectively;

Indexed as

administration programbroilercaecal microbiotafeed conversion ratiofoot pad dermatitisperformanceplasma metabolitepoultry gut healthsynbiotic supplement

Identifiers

PMID32245036
PMCPMC7143825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.