Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32244940›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Primary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Breast: Case Series and Literature Review.

Burcin Özdirik, Antonin Kayser, Andrea Ullrich, Lynn J Savic, Markus Reiss, Frank Tacke, Bertram Wiedenmann, Henning Jann, Christoph Roderburg

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetic and immunohistochemical profiling of small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the breast.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Burcin ÖzdirikDepartment of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Charité University Medical Center Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Charité Mitte, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8885-737X
Antonin KayserDepartment of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Charité University Medical Center Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Charité Mitte, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6799-6293
Andrea UllrichDepartment of Pathology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Lynn J SavicDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2115-6728
Markus ReissDepartment of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Charité University Medical Center Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Charité Mitte, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Frank TackeDepartment of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Charité University Medical Center Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Charité Mitte, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6206-0226
Bertram WiedenmannDepartment of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Charité University Medical Center Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Charité Mitte, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Henning JannDepartment of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Charité University Medical Center Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Charité Mitte, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Christoph RoderburgDepartment of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Charité University Medical Center Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Charité Mitte, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast (NECB) as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2012 is a rare, but possibly under-diagnosed entity. It is heterogeneous as it entails a wide spectrum of diseases comprising both well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the breast as well as highly aggressive small cell carcinomas. Retrospective screening of hospital charts of 612 patients (2008-2019) from our specialized outpatient unit for neuroendocrine neoplasia revealed five patients diagnosed with NECB. Given the low prevalence of these malignancies, correct diagnosis remains a challenge that requires an interdisciplinary approach. Specifically, NECB may be misclassified as carcinoma of the breast with neuroendocrine differentiation, carcinomas of the breast of no special type/invasive ductal carcinoma, or a metastasis to the breast. Therefore, this study presents multifaceted characteristics as well as the clinical course of these patients and discusses the five cases from our institution in the context of available literature.

Indexed as

case seriesdiagnosticshistologymanagementneuroendocrine carcinoma of the breastreviewsmall cell carcinoma of the breast

Identifiers

PMID32244940
PMCPMC7140078
OpenAlexW3010883537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.