Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32244907›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Quality and Physicochemical Traits of Carcasses and Meat from Geese Fed with Lupin-Rich Feed.

Joanna Kuźniacka, Marcin Hejdysz, Mirosław Banaszak, Jakub Biesek, Sebastian Kaczmarek, Małgorzata Grabowicz, Andrzej Rutkowski, Marek Adamski

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joanna KuźniackaDepartment of Animal Breeding, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, UTP - University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, Mazowiecka 28, 85-084 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Marcin HejdyszDepartment of Animal Breeding and Product Quality Assessment, UP Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wołyńska 33, 60-637 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1772-7997
Mirosław BanaszakDepartment of Animal Breeding, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, UTP - University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, Mazowiecka 28, 85-084 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8681-7286
Jakub BiesekDepartment of Animal Breeding, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, UTP - University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, Mazowiecka 28, 85-084 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3050-8617
Sebastian KaczmarekDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Management, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wołyńska 33, 60-637 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3638-4192
Małgorzata GrabowiczDepartment of Physiology, Zoophysiotherapy and Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, UTP - University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, UTP - University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, Mazowiecka 28, 85-084 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Andrzej RutkowskiDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Management, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wołyńska 33, 60-637 Poznań, Poland.
Marek AdamskiDepartment of Animal Breeding, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, UTP - University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, Mazowiecka 28, 85-084 Bydgoszcz, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyze the quality of geese meat receiving feed with soybean meal (group 1), yellow lupin (group 2), narrow-leaved lupin (group 3), or white lupin (group 4). In total, 400 male White Kołuda

Indexed as

carcassfatnessgooselupinmeat qualitymusclesprotein

Identifiers

PMID32244907
PMCPMC7143909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.