ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020
Fully Digital Workflow for Planning Static Guided Implant Surgery: A Prospective Accuracy Study.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Fiducial Marker Design (Shape, Size, and Configuration) on the Trueness and Precision of CBCT Marker-Geometry Reproduction for CBCT-Intraoral Scan Registration: An In Vitro Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Automating virtual dental implant planning: can artificial intelligence match clinical expertise?Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2026Article
- Influence of Bone Density and Guide Protocol on the Accuracy of Self-Cutting Implants Using Static Guided Implant Placement-An In Vitro Study.Clinical oral implants research · 2025Article
- Beyond Accuracy: Clinical Outcomes of Computer Assisted Implant Surgery.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Review
- Clinical accuracy assessment of a dynamic navigation system and surgical guide using an oral appliance-secured patient tracker targeting anterior teeth.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Observational
- Accuracy of robot-assisted implant surgery versus freehand placement: a retrospective clinical study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Article
- Assessing the precision of 3D-printed surgical templates in oral implant placement: a comparison of half and full-guided approaches.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of the accuracy of guided implant surgery between two implant-planning software: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
- Impact of Digital Workflow Integration on Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review of Advances and Clinical Outcomes.Cureus · 2024Review
- Accuracy of dental implant placement using different dynamic navigation and robotic systems: an in vitro study.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Accuracy evaluation of a universal dental implant guide for simulating implantation in posterior area on dental molds.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2024Article
- Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guides and the freehand approach in implant placement: a prospective clinical study.Head & face medicine · 2024Article
- Intraoral scanning of the edentulous jaw without additional markers: AnImaging science in dentistry · 2023Article
- Autonomous Robotic Surgery for Immediately Loaded Implant-Supported Maxillary Full-Arch Prosthesis: A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Can computer-assisted implant surgery improve clinical outcomes and reduce the frequency and intensity of complications in implant dentistry? A critical review.Periodontology 2000 · 2022Review
- [Accuracy of computer-guided oral implant placement and influencing factors].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022Article
- Accuracy of DICOM-DICOM vs. DICOM-STL Protocols in Computer-Guided Surgery: A Human Clinical Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Preliminary study on the osseointegration effects of contactless automated implant cavity preparation via femtosecond laser ablation.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Integration of imaging modalities in digital dental workflows - possibilities, limitations, and potential future developments.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2021Article
- Comparison of Dental Surface Image Registration and Fiducial Marker Registration: An In Vivo Accuracy Study of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The accuracy of static guided implant surgery (sGIS) using conventional planning workflow has been extensively examined; however, more information is required to justify the application of fully digital planning protocol. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical accuracy of sGIS with a fully digital planning workflow. Twenty-one partially edentulous patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scans were taken and superimposed by matching the dental surface images directly (surface registration protocol) or by matching fiducial markers on a stereolithographic (SLA) radiographic template fabricated from the digital data of the intraoral scan (fiducial marker registration protocol). Virtual implant treatment plans were then determined, and tooth-supported SLA surgical guides were fabricated according to the plans. Twenty-six implant surgeries were performed via the surgical guide by one surgeon. Pre- and post-operative CBCT images were superimposed, and the positional and angular deviations between placed and planned implants were measured with metrology software. A total of 43 fully guided implants were placed, in which 25 implants were planned with the surface registration protocol. Implants planned based on the surface registration protocol had a larger mean angular deviation than the fiducial marker registration protocol. No significant differences were found for any deviations of the examined variables. Within the limits of this study, we concluded that the clinical accuracy of the sGIS planned with a fully digital workflow was consistent with the conventional workflow for partially edentulous patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.