Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32244565›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Nematicidal Amendments and Soil Remediation.

Nikoletta Ntalli, Zbigniew Adamski, Maria Doula, Nikolaos Monokrousos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Effect ofCommunicative & integrative biology · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Sustainable Use of Bioactive Compounds fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nikoletta NtalliDepartment of Pesticides Control and Phytopharmacy, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 8 S. Delta Str., 14561 Athens, Greece.
Zbigniew AdamskiElectron and Confocal Microscope Laboratory, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, 61-614 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8696-3785
Maria DoulaLaboratory of Non-Parasitic Diseases, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 8 S. Delta Str., 14561 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-1927-9051
Nikolaos MonokrousosLaboratory of Molecular Ecology, International Hellenic University, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-5465-5588

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intensification of agriculture has created concerns about soil degradation and toxicity of agricultural chemicals to non-target organisms. As a result, there is great urgency for discovering new ecofriendly tools for pest management and plant nutrition. Botanical matrices and their extracts and purified secondary metabolites have received much research interest, but time-consuming registration issues have slowed their adoption. In contrast, cultural practices such as use of plant matrices as soil amendments could be immediately used as plant protectants or organic fertilizers. Herein, we focus on some types of soil amendments of botanical origin and their utilization for nematicidal activity and enhancement of plant nutrition. The mode of action is discussed in terms of parasite control as well as plant growth stimulation.

Indexed as

biofumigationbotanical amendmentMeloidogynenematodeorganic fertilizationsoil incorporation

Identifiers

PMID32244565
PMCPMC7238745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.