ArticleMicromachines2020
Editorial for the Special Issue on 3D Printing for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.
Article in Micromachines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Dynamic 3D Human Liver Sinusoid Model for Mechanistic Interrogation of Fontan-Associated Liver Disease.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Multi-material Gradient Printing Using Meniscus-enabled Projection Stereolithography (MAPS).Advanced materials technologies · 2025Article
- Leveraging 3D Bioprinting and Photon-Counting Computed Tomography to Enable Noninvasive Quantitative Tracking of Multifunctional Tissue Engineered Constructs.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Article
- 3D bioprinting of nanoparticle-laden hydrogel scaffolds with enhanced antibacterial and imaging properties.iScience · 2022Article
- Additive Manufactured Polymers in Dentistry, Current State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives-A Review.Polymers · 2022Review
- Hope for bone regeneration: The versatility of iron oxide nanoparticles.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- A 3D Bioprinted In Vitro Model of Pulmonary Artery Atresia to Evaluate Endothelial Cell Response to Microenvironment.Advanced healthcare materials · 2021Article
- Ex Vivo and In Vivo Analyses of Novel 3D-Printed Bone Substitute Scaffolds Incorporating Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Granules for Bone Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- 3D Bioprinted Bacteriostatic Hyperelastic Bone Scaffold for Damage-Specific Bone Regeneration.Polymers · 2021Article
- Polymer-Based Scaffolds for Soft-Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting uses additive manufacturing techniques to fabricate 3Dstructures consisting of heterogenous selections of living cells, biomaterials, and active biomolecules[1,2] [...].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.