Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32244477›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

A Follow-Up Study of Cognitive Development in Low Risk Preterm Children.

Miguel Pérez-Pereira, María Pilar Fernández, María Luisa Gómez-Taibo, Zeltia Martínez-López, Constantino Arce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Preterm birth and early life environmental factors: neuropsychological profiles at adolescence and young adulthood.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Special Issue: Preterm Birth: Research, Intervention and Developmental Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Learning Abilities in a Population of Italian Healthy Preterm Children at the End of Primary School.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miguel Pérez-PereiraDepartment of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8679-6027
María Pilar FernándezDepartment of Psychology, University of A Coruña, 15190 A Coruña, Spain.
María Luisa Gómez-TaiboDepartment of Psychology, University of A Coruña, 15190 A Coruña, Spain.
Zeltia Martínez-LópezDepartment of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9499-7179
Constantino ArceDeparment of Social, Basic and Methodological Psychology, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The results of a longitudinal study on the cognitive development of one group of full-term and three groups of low risk preterm children with different gestational ages (GA) are presented. The 181 participants were divided into four GA groups of similar size. The aims were: 1) To check if there are differences in cognitive development (measured through the Batelle scale) among the GA groups. 2) To establish the predictive factors of cognitive development at 22 and 60 months of age, taking into account biomedical, environmental and individual factors. The results of the repeated measures ANOVA performed at 22 and 60 months of age indicated that the cognitive trajectories of the four GA groups were similar. Linear regression analyses showed that the effect of the different predictors changed in relation to the time of measurement of cognitive development. Biological factors and the quality of home environment had a moderate effect on the cognitive development at 22 months of age. Cognitive results obtained at 22 months of age, and, to a lesser extent, working memory had the greatest effect on cognitive development at 60 months. GA does not predict cognitive development. Preterm children do not show cognitive delay if they are healthy.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentCognitionInfant, PrematureChildChild, PreschoolFollow-Up StudiesGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornLongitudinal Studiescognitive developmentlongitudinal studypredictive factorspreterm children

Identifiers

PMID32244477
PMCPMC7178262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.