Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32244292›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2020

Applications of Machine Learning Predictive Models in the Chronic Disease Diagnosis.

Gopi Battineni, Getu Gamo Sagaro, Nalini Chinatalapudi, Francesco Amenta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. [Machine learning-based prediction model for caries in the first molars of 9-year-old children in Suzhou].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gopi BattineniCenter for Telemedicine and Tele pharmacy, School of Medicinal and Health Sciences Products, University of Camerino, Via Madonna Della carceri 9, 62032 Camerino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0603-2356
Getu Gamo SagaroCenter for Telemedicine and Tele pharmacy, School of Medicinal and Health Sciences Products, University of Camerino, Via Madonna Della carceri 9, 62032 Camerino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5983-0266
Nalini ChinatalapudiCenter for Telemedicine and Tele pharmacy, School of Medicinal and Health Sciences Products, University of Camerino, Via Madonna Della carceri 9, 62032 Camerino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0818-306X
Francesco AmentaCenter for Telemedicine and Tele pharmacy, School of Medicinal and Health Sciences Products, University of Camerino, Via Madonna Della carceri 9, 62032 Camerino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reviews applications of machine learning (ML) predictive models in the diagnosis of chronic diseases. Chronic diseases (CDs) are responsible for a major portion of global health costs. Patients who suffer from these diseases need lifelong treatment. Nowadays, predictive models are frequently applied in the diagnosis and forecasting of these diseases. In this study, we reviewed the state-of-the-art approaches that encompass ML models in the primary diagnosis of CD. This analysis covers 453 papers published between 2015 and 2019, and our document search was conducted from PubMed (Medline), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) libraries. Ultimately, 22 studies were selected to present all modeling methods in a precise way that explains CD diagnosis and usage models of individual pathologies with associated strengths and limitations. Our outcomes suggest that there are no standard methods to determine the best approach in real-time clinical practice since each method has its advantages and disadvantages. Among the methods considered, support vector machines (SVM), logistic regression (LR), clustering were the most commonly used. These models are highly applicable in classification, and diagnosis of CD and are expected to become more important in medical practice in the near future.

Indexed as

accuracychronic diseasesdisease classificationpathologiesprediction models

Identifiers

PMID32244292
PMCPMC7354442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.