Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32244287›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Effectiveness and Efficiency of Persuasive Space Graphics (PSG) in Motivating UK Primary School Children's Hand Hygiene.

Sophie Rutter, Catherine Stones, Jane Wood, Colin Macduff, Margarita Gomez-Escalada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sophie RutterInformation School, the University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3249-5269
Catherine StonesSchool of Design, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Jane WoodSchool of Design, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Colin MacduffSchool of Design, Glasgow School of Art, Glasgow G3 6RQ, UK.
Margarita Gomez-EscaladaSchool of Clinical and Applied Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Good hand hygiene is necessary to control and prevent infections, but many children do not adequately wash their hands. While there are classroom communications targeted at children, the toilet space, the location of many hand hygiene activities, is neglected. This paper describes an initial evaluation of "123" persuasive space graphics (images and messages integrated within an architectural environment that encourage specific actions). The effectiveness (whether hand hygiene improves) and efficiency (the ease with which a setting can adopt and implement an intervention) is evaluated in three UK schools and one museum. Five evaluations (participant demographic, handwashing frequency, handwashing quality, design persuasiveness, stakeholder views) were conducted. In the school settings, persuasive space graphics increased the quality and frequency of handwashing. In the museum setting, frequency of handwashing slightly increased. In all settings children found the graphics persuasive, and stakeholders also believed them to be effective. Stakeholders considered persuasive space graphics a low-cost and time-efficient way to communicate. It can be concluded that persuasive space graphics are effective in increasing hand hygiene, particularly in school settings where children have a longer exposure to the graphics. Persuasive space graphics are also an efficient low-cost means of communicating hand hygiene.

Indexed as

Audiovisual AidsHand HygieneHealth CommunicationPersuasive CommunicationChildFemaleHand DisinfectionHumansMaleSchoolsUnited Kingdomchildrendata collection toolshand hygienehandwashingmeasuresresearch methodsschools

Identifiers

PMID32244287
PMCPMC7177326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.