Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32244230›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2020

Motion correction of respiratory-gated PET images using deep learning based image registration framework.

Tiantian Li, Mengxi Zhang, Wenyuan Qi, Evren Asma, Jinyi Qi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Total-body pediatric PET is ready for prime time.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Quantitative PET in the 2020s: a roadmap.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tiantian LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States of America.
Mengxi ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States of America.
Wenyuan QiCanon Medical Research USA, Inc., 706 N Deerpath Dr., Vernon Hills, IL 60061, United States of America.
Evren AsmaCanon Medical Research USA, Inc., 706 N Deerpath Dr., Vernon Hills, IL 60061, United States of America.
Jinyi QiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5428-0322

Funding

Optimization of PET ImagingR01EB000194 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI QI, JINYI · 2003 to 2018
$3.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artifacts caused by patient breathing and movement during PET data acquisition affect image quality. Respiratory gating is commonly used to gate the list-mode PET data into multiple bins over a respiratory cycle. Non-rigid registration of respiratory-gated PET images can reduce motion artifacts and preserve count statistics, but it is time consuming. In this work, we propose an unsupervised non-rigid image registration framework using deep learning for motion correction. Our network uses a differentiable spatial transformer layer to warp the moving image to the fixed image and uses a stacked structure for deformation field refinement. Estimated deformation fields were incorporated into an iterative image reconstruction algorithm to perform motion compensated PET image reconstruction. We validated the proposed method using simulation and clinical data and implemented an iterative image registration approach for comparison. Motion compensated reconstructions were compared with ungated images. Our simulation study showed that the motion compensated methods can generate images with sharp boundaries and reveal more details in the heart region compared with the ungated image. The resulting normalized root mean square error (NRMS) was 24.3 ± 1.7% for the deep learning based motion correction, 31.1 ± 1.4% for the iterative registration based motion correction, and 41.9 ± 2.0% for ungated reconstruction. The proposed deep learning based motion correction reduced the bias compared with the ungated image without increasing the noise level and outperformed the iterative registration based method. In the real data study, both motion compensated images provided higher lesion contrast and sharper liver boundaries than the ungated image and had lower noise than the reference gate image. The contrast of the proposed method based on the deep neural network was higher than the ungated image and iterative registration method at any matched noise level.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMovementPositron-Emission TomographyRespiratory-Gated Imaging TechniquesArtifactsHumansImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID32244230
PMCPMC7446936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.