ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2020
Motion correction of respiratory-gated PET images using deep learning based image registration framework.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mapping the research landscape of PET/CT in lymphoma: insights from a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Enhanced attenuation correction in FDG-PET/CT with respiratory mismatch correction.EJNMMI reports · 2025Article
- Motion study on upright patient positioning in walk-through PET: evaluation in a clinical setting.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in four-dimensional imaging for motion management in radiation therapy.Artificial intelligence review · 2025Article
- Radiomics and dosiomics approaches to estimate lung function after stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with lung tumors.Radiological physics and technology · 2025Article
- Deep learning-aided respiratory motion compensation in PET/CT: addressing motion induced resolution loss, attenuation correction artifacts and PET-CT misalignment.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Article
- Motion-correction strategies for enhancing whole-body PET imaging.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning for Advancing PET Image Reconstruction: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions.Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine · 2023Review
- Unsupervised deep learning framework for data-driven gating in positron emission tomography.Medical physics · 2023Article
- A deep learning approach for automatic tumor delineation in stereotactic radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer using diagnostic PET-CT and planning CT.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Comparison of protocols with respiratory-gated (4D) motion compensation in PET/CT: open-source package for quantification of phantom image quality.EJNMMI physics · 2022Article
- Total-body pediatric PET is ready for prime time.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Unsupervised inter-frame motion correction for whole-body dynamic PET using convolutional long short-term memory in a convolutional neural network.Medical image analysis · 2022Article
- Dynamic imaging using motion-compensated smoothness regularization on manifolds (MoCo-SToRM).Physics in medicine and biology · 2022 · on this mapArticle
- Deep Learning Based Joint PET Image Reconstruction and Motion Estimation.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2022Article
- MDPET: A Unified Motion Correction and Denoising Adversarial Network for Low-Dose Gated PET.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2021Article
- Review
- Quantitative PET in the 2020s: a roadmap.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artifacts caused by patient breathing and movement during PET data acquisition affect image quality. Respiratory gating is commonly used to gate the list-mode PET data into multiple bins over a respiratory cycle. Non-rigid registration of respiratory-gated PET images can reduce motion artifacts and preserve count statistics, but it is time consuming. In this work, we propose an unsupervised non-rigid image registration framework using deep learning for motion correction. Our network uses a differentiable spatial transformer layer to warp the moving image to the fixed image and uses a stacked structure for deformation field refinement. Estimated deformation fields were incorporated into an iterative image reconstruction algorithm to perform motion compensated PET image reconstruction. We validated the proposed method using simulation and clinical data and implemented an iterative image registration approach for comparison. Motion compensated reconstructions were compared with ungated images. Our simulation study showed that the motion compensated methods can generate images with sharp boundaries and reveal more details in the heart region compared with the ungated image. The resulting normalized root mean square error (NRMS) was 24.3 ± 1.7% for the deep learning based motion correction, 31.1 ± 1.4% for the iterative registration based motion correction, and 41.9 ± 2.0% for ungated reconstruction. The proposed deep learning based motion correction reduced the bias compared with the ungated image without increasing the noise level and outperformed the iterative registration based method. In the real data study, both motion compensated images provided higher lesion contrast and sharper liver boundaries than the ungated image and had lower noise than the reference gate image. The contrast of the proposed method based on the deep neural network was higher than the ungated image and iterative registration method at any matched noise level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.