Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32243860›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2020

Dynamic Representation of Taste-Related Decisions in the Gustatory Insular Cortex of Mice.

Roberto Vincis, Ke Chen, Lindsey Czarnecki, John Chen, Alfredo Fontanini

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Insular cortex predictions regulate glucose homeostasis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Epigenetic manipulation of anterior insular cortex alters neural signals and cognitive control.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Contribution of Rat Insular Cortex to Stimulus-Guided Action.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cortical Coding of Gustatory and Thermal Signals in Active Licking Mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Multisensory Integration Underlies the Distinct Representation of Odor-Taste Mixtures in the Gustatory Cortex of Behaving Rats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roberto VincisDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA; Department of Biological Science and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA. Electronic address: rvincis@fsu.edu.
Ke ChenDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA; Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA. Electronic address: ke.chen@stonybrook.edu.
Lindsey CzarneckiDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
John ChenDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA; Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Alfredo FontaniniDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA; Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA. Electronic address: alfredo.fontanini@stonybrook.edu.
Stony Brook University · USFlorida State University · US

Funding

Synaptic organization and plasticity of the input from the basolateral amygdala tR01DC013770 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI Alfredo Fontanini, Arianna Maffei · 2014 to 2026
$4.6M
Gustatory cortex and reward-based, taste-action associationsR01DC018227 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI FONTANINI, ALFREDO · 2019 to 2023
$2.2M
Laminar differences in taste coding: a circuit perspectiveR01DC015234 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI FONTANINI, ALFREDO, MAFFEI, ARIANNA · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
The role of mediodorsal thalamus in tasteR21DC016714 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI VINCIS, ROBERTO · 2018 to 2020
$465k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013770NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015234NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018227NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC016714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research over the past decade has established the gustatory insular cortex (GC) as a model for studying how primary sensory cortices integrate sensory, affective, and cognitive signals. This integration occurs through time-varying patterns of neural activity. Selective silencing of GC activity during specific temporal windows provided evidence for GC's role in mediating taste palatability and expectation. Recent results also suggest that this area may play a role in decision making. However, existing data are limited to GC involvement in controlling the timing of stereotyped, orofacial reactions to aversive tastants during consumption. Here, we present electrophysiological, chemogenetic, and optogenetic results demonstrating the key role of GC in the execution of a taste-guided, reward-directed decision-making task. Mice were trained in a two-alternative choice task, in which they had to associate tastants sampled from a central spout with different actions (i.e., licking either a left or a right spout). Stimulus sampling and action were separated by a delay period. Electrophysiological recordings revealed chemosensory processing during the sampling period and the emergence of task-related, cognitive signals during the delay period. Chemogenetic silencing of GC impaired task performance. Optogenetic silencing of GC allowed us to tease apart the contribution of activity during sampling and delay periods. Although silencing during the sampling period had no effect, silencing during the delay period significantly impacted behavioral performance, demonstrating the importance of the cognitive signals processed by GC in driving decision making. Altogether, our data highlight a novel role of GC in controlling taste-guided, reward-directed choices and actions.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalCerebral CortexLearningMiceTastedecision makinggustatory cortexlickingsensorimotor transformationtastetemporal codingtemporal dynamics

Identifiers

PMID32243860
PMCPMC7239762
OpenAlexW3014651277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.