Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32243857›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2020

Reward Association Enhances Stimulus-Specific Representations in Primary Visual Cortex.

Julia U Henschke, Evelyn Dylda, Danai Katsanevaki, Nathalie Dupuy, Stephen P Currie, Theoklitos Amvrosiadis, Janelle M P Pakan, Nathalie L Rochefort

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Stimulus Repetition Induces a Two-Stage Learning Process in the Primary Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julia U HenschkeCenter for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany.
Evelyn DyldaCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 15 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK.
Danai KatsanevakiCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 15 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK.
Nathalie DupuyCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 15 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK.
Stephen P CurrieCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 15 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK.
Theoklitos AmvrosiadisCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 15 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK.
Janelle M P PakanCenter for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany. Electronic address: janelle.pakan@med.ovgu.de.
Nathalie L RochefortCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 15 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK; Simons Initiative for the Developing Brain, University of Edinburgh, 15 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, UK. Electronic address: n.rochefort@ed.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential for neuronal representations of external stimuli to be modified by previous experience is critical for efficient sensory processing and improved behavioral outcomes. To investigate how repeated exposure to a visual stimulus affects its representation in mouse primary visual cortex (V1), we performed two-photon calcium imaging of layer 2/3 neurons and assessed responses before, during, and after the presentation of a repetitive stimulus over 5 consecutive days. We found a stimulus-specific enhancement of the neuronal representation of the repetitively presented stimulus when it was associated with a reward. This was observed both after mice actively learned a rewarded task and when the reward was randomly received. Stimulus-specific enhanced representation resulted both from neurons gaining selectivity and from increased response reliability in previously selective neurons. In the absence of reward, there was either no change in stimulus representation or a decreased representation when the stimulus was viewed at a fixed temporal frequency. Pairing a second stimulus with a reward led to a similar enhanced representation and increased discriminability between the equally rewarded stimuli. Single-neuron responses showed that separate subpopulations discriminated between the two rewarded stimuli depending on whether the stimuli were displayed in a virtual environment or viewed on a single screen. We suggest that reward-associated responses enable the generalization of enhanced stimulus representation across these V1 subpopulations. We propose that this dynamic regulation of visual processing based on the behavioral relevance of sensory input ultimately enhances and stabilizes the representation of task-relevant features while suppressing responses to non-relevant stimuli.

Indexed as

RewardWaterAnimalsDrinkingFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOrientationVisual CortexWaterawake mouselayer 2/3locomotionorientation selectivityplasiticyreinforcement learningrewardstimulus discriminationvisual cortexvisuomotor

Identifiers

PMID32243857
PMCPMC7237886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.