Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32243654›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2020

ACVIM consensus statement guidelines for the classification, diagnosis, and management of cardiomyopathies in cats.

Virginia Luis Fuentes, Jonathan Abbott, Valérie Chetboul, Etienne Côté, Philip R Fox, Jens Häggström, Mark D Kittleson, Karsten Schober, Joshua A Stern

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 201 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
201citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

201 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 394 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

141 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Virginia Luis FuentesDepartment of Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8076-3806
Jonathan AbbottDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6981-8968
Valérie ChetboulAlfort Cardiology Unit (UCA), Université Paris-Est, École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vétérinaire d'Alfort (CHUVA), Maisons-Alfort cedex, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7891-1814
Etienne CôtéDepartment of Companion Animals, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2049-1145
Philip R FoxAnimal Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4089-0573
Jens HäggströmDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3402-023X
Mark D KittlesonDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Karsten SchoberDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Joshua A SternDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5611-5745
University of California, Davis · USÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort · FRRoyal Veterinary College · GBSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEThe Ohio State University · USThe Schwarzman Animal Medical Center · USUniversity of Prince Edward Island · CAUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiomyopathies are a heterogeneous group of myocardial disorders of mostly unknown etiology, and they occur commonly in cats. In some cats, they are well-tolerated and are associated with normal life expectancy, but in other cats they can result in congestive heart failure, arterial thromboembolism or sudden death. Cardiomyopathy classification in cats can be challenging, and in this consensus statement we outline a classification system based on cardiac structure and function (phenotype). We also introduce a staging system for cardiomyopathy that includes subdivision of cats with subclinical cardiomyopathy into those at low risk of life-threatening complications and those at higher risk. Based on the available literature, we offer recommendations for the approach to diagnosis and staging of cardiomyopathies, as well as for management at each stage.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiomyopathiesCat DiseasesCatsConsensusHeartPractice Guidelines as TopicSocieties, Veterinaryarrhythmogeniccardiovascularcongestive heart failureconsensus statementechocardiographyfelinehearthypertrophic cardiomyopathyrestrictive cardiomyopathyreviewtreatment

Identifiers

PMID32243654
PMCPMC7255676
OpenAlexW3014590495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.