ArticlePloS one2020
A restriction enzyme reduced representation sequencing approach for low-cost, high-throughput metagenome profiling.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reliable enteric methane prediction from the cattle (Bos taurus) rumen microbiome.Communications biology · 2026Article
- The draft genome of the Wisconsin Miniature SwineTM, a valuable biomedical research tool.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Rumen metagenome profiles are heritable and rank the New Zealand national sheep flock for enteric methane emissions.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- Hybridization ddRAD-sequencing and phenotypic analysis clarify the phylogeographic structure and evolution of an alpineFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Exploring the Linkage Between Ruminal Microbial Communities on Postweaning and Finishing Diets and Their Relation to Residual Feed Intake in Beef Cattle.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Readsynth: short-read simulation for consideration of composition-biases in reduced metagenome sequencing approaches.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- A Review of the Rumen Microbiota and the Different Molecular Techniques Used to Identify Microorganisms Found in the Rumen Fluid of Ruminants.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Review
- Characterization of the Ruminal Microbiome of Water BuffaloesAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Article
- Combining host and rumen metagenome profiling for selection in sheep: prediction of methane, feed efficiency, production, and health traits.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Effects of Dietary Nonfibrous Carbohydrate/Neutral Detergent Fiber Ratio on Methanogenic Archaea and Cellulose-Degrading Bacteria in the Rumen of Karakul Sheep: a 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Study.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Genomic insights into the physiology of Quinella, an iconic uncultured rumen bacterium.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Low-cost sample preservation methods for high-throughput processing of rumen microbiomes.Animal microbiome · 2022Article
- Bovine host genome acts on rumen microbiome function linked to methane emissions.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Species-resolved sequencing of low-biomass or degraded microbiomes using 2bRAD-M.Genome biology · 2022Article
- Metagenomic Predictions: A Review 10 years on.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- The potential for mitigation of methane emissions in ruminants through the application of metagenomics, metabolomics, and other -OMICS technologies.Journal of animal science · 2021Review
- Article
- Why breed disease-resilient livestock, and how?Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2020Review
- Large-Scale Phenotyping of Livestock Welfare in Commercial Production Systems: A New Frontier in Animal Breeding.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial community profiles have been associated with a variety of traits, including methane emissions in livestock. These profiles can be difficult and expensive to obtain for thousands of samples (e.g. for accurate association of microbial profiles with traits), therefore the objective of this work was to develop a low-cost, high-throughput approach to capture the diversity of the rumen microbiome. Restriction enzyme reduced representation sequencing (RE-RRS) using ApeKI or PstI, and two bioinformatic pipelines (reference-based and reference-free) were compared to bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing using repeated samples collected two weeks apart from 118 sheep that were phenotypically extreme (60 high and 58 low) for methane emitted per kg dry matter intake (n = 236). DNA was extracted from freeze-dried rumen samples using a phenol chloroform and bead-beating protocol prior to RE-RRS. The resulting sequences were used to investigate the repeatability of the rumen microbial community profiles, the effect of laboratory and analytical method, and the relationship with methane production. The results suggested that the best method was PstI RE-RRS analyzed with the reference-free approach, which accounted for 53.3±5.9% of reads, and had repeatabilities of 0.49±0.07 and 0.50±0.07 for the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2), phenotypic correlations with methane yield of 0.43±0.06 and 0.46±0.06 for PC1 and PC2, and explained 41±8% of the variation in methane yield. These results were significantly better than for bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the same samples (p<0.05) except for the correlation between PC2 and methane yield. A Sensitivity study suggested approximately 2000 samples could be sequenced in a single lane on an Illumina HiSeq 2500, meaning the current work using 118 samples/lane and future proposed 384 samples/lane are well within that threshold. With minor adaptations, our approach could be used to obtain microbial profiles from other metagenomic samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.