Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32243481›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

A restriction enzyme reduced representation sequencing approach for low-cost, high-throughput metagenome profiling.

Melanie K Hess, Suzanne J Rowe, Tracey C Van Stijn, Hannah M Henry, Sharon M Hickey, Rudiger Brauning, Alan F McCulloch, Andrew S Hess, Michelle R Kirk, Sandeep Kumar and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Characterization of the Ruminal Microbiome of Water BuffaloesAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Why breed disease-resilient livestock, and how?Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Melanie K HessAgResearch Limited, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Mosgiel, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7502-0036
Suzanne J RoweAgResearch Limited, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Mosgiel, New Zealand.
Tracey C Van StijnAgResearch Limited, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Mosgiel, New Zealand.
Hannah M HenryAgResearch Limited, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Mosgiel, New Zealand.
Sharon M HickeyAgResearch Limited, Ruakura Agricultural Centre, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Rudiger BrauningAgResearch Limited, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Mosgiel, New Zealand.
Alan F McCullochAgResearch Limited, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Mosgiel, New Zealand.
Andrew S HessAgResearch Limited, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Mosgiel, New Zealand.
Michelle R KirkAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Sandeep KumarAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7097-6848
Cesar Pinares-PatiñoAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Sandra KittelmannAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Graham R WoodAgResearch Limited, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Mosgiel, New Zealand.
Peter H JanssenAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1022-3502
John C McEwanAgResearch Limited, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Mosgiel, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4801-6207

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial community profiles have been associated with a variety of traits, including methane emissions in livestock. These profiles can be difficult and expensive to obtain for thousands of samples (e.g. for accurate association of microbial profiles with traits), therefore the objective of this work was to develop a low-cost, high-throughput approach to capture the diversity of the rumen microbiome. Restriction enzyme reduced representation sequencing (RE-RRS) using ApeKI or PstI, and two bioinformatic pipelines (reference-based and reference-free) were compared to bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing using repeated samples collected two weeks apart from 118 sheep that were phenotypically extreme (60 high and 58 low) for methane emitted per kg dry matter intake (n = 236). DNA was extracted from freeze-dried rumen samples using a phenol chloroform and bead-beating protocol prior to RE-RRS. The resulting sequences were used to investigate the repeatability of the rumen microbial community profiles, the effect of laboratory and analytical method, and the relationship with methane production. The results suggested that the best method was PstI RE-RRS analyzed with the reference-free approach, which accounted for 53.3±5.9% of reads, and had repeatabilities of 0.49±0.07 and 0.50±0.07 for the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2), phenotypic correlations with methane yield of 0.43±0.06 and 0.46±0.06 for PC1 and PC2, and explained 41±8% of the variation in methane yield. These results were significantly better than for bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the same samples (p<0.05) except for the correlation between PC2 and methane yield. A Sensitivity study suggested approximately 2000 samples could be sequenced in a single lane on an Illumina HiSeq 2500, meaning the current work using 118 samples/lane and future proposed 384 samples/lane are well within that threshold. With minor adaptations, our approach could be used to obtain microbial profiles from other metagenomic samples.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMaleMetagenomeMetagenomicsMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRumenSheepRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID32243481
PMCPMC7122713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.