Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32243473›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Alterations in the structural characteristics of rectus abdominis muscles caused by diabetes and pregnancy: A comparative study of the rat model and women.

Giovana Vesentini, Angélica M P Barbosa, Débora C Damasceno, Gabriela Marini, Fernanda Piculo, Selma M M Matheus, Raghavendra L S Hallur, Sthefanie K Nunes, Bruna B Catinelli, Claudia G Magalhães and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Impact of Obesity and Hyperglycemia on Pregnancy-specific Urinary Incontinence.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giovana VesentiniPerinatal Diabetes Research Center, University Hospital, Botucatu Medical School, Univ Estadual Paulista_UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7116-1667
Angélica M P BarbosaPerinatal Diabetes Research Center, University Hospital, Botucatu Medical School, Univ Estadual Paulista_UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Débora C DamascenoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu Medical School, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gabriela MariniPerinatal Diabetes Research Center, University Hospital, Botucatu Medical School, Univ Estadual Paulista_UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernanda PiculoPerinatal Diabetes Research Center, University Hospital, Botucatu Medical School, Univ Estadual Paulista_UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Selma M M MatheusPerinatal Diabetes Research Center, University Hospital, Botucatu Medical School, Univ Estadual Paulista_UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Raghavendra L S HallurPerinatal Diabetes Research Center, University Hospital, Botucatu Medical School, Univ Estadual Paulista_UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sthefanie K NunesPerinatal Diabetes Research Center, University Hospital, Botucatu Medical School, Univ Estadual Paulista_UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bruna B CatinelliPerinatal Diabetes Research Center, University Hospital, Botucatu Medical School, Univ Estadual Paulista_UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Claudia G MagalhãesPerinatal Diabetes Research Center, University Hospital, Botucatu Medical School, Univ Estadual Paulista_UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Roberto CostaPerinatal Diabetes Research Center, University Hospital, Botucatu Medical School, Univ Estadual Paulista_UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Joelcio F AbbadePerinatal Diabetes Research Center, University Hospital, Botucatu Medical School, Univ Estadual Paulista_UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
José E CorrentePerinatal Diabetes Research Center, University Hospital, Botucatu Medical School, Univ Estadual Paulista_UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Iracema M P CalderonPerinatal Diabetes Research Center, University Hospital, Botucatu Medical School, Univ Estadual Paulista_UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marilza V C RudgePerinatal Diabetes Research Center, University Hospital, Botucatu Medical School, Univ Estadual Paulista_UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
DIAMATER Study Group
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Sagrado Coração · BR

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/15/5/31446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveIn the present study, we compared the effect of diabetic pregnancy on the rectus abdominis muscle (RAM) in humans and rats. We hypothesized that our animal model could provide valuable information about alterations in the RAM of women with Gestational Diabetes (GDM).

methodNewborns female rats (n = 10/group) were administered streptozotocin (100 mg/kg body weight) subcutaneously and were mated on reaching adulthood, to develop the mild hyperglycemic pregnant (MHP) rat model. At the end of pregnancy, the mothers were sacrificed, and the RAM tissue was collected. Pregnant women without GDM (non-GDM group; n = 10) and those diagnosed with GDM (GDM group; n = 8) and undergoing treatment were recruited, and RAM samples were obtained at C-section. The RAM architecture and the distribution of the fast and slow fibers and collagen were studied by immunohistochemistry.

resultsNo statistically significant differences in the maternal and fetal characters were observed between the groups in both rats and women. However, significant changes in RAM architecture were observed. Diabetes in pregnancy increased the abundance of slow fibers and decreased fast fiber number and area in both rats and women. A decrease in collagen distribution was observed in GDM women; however, a similar change was not observed in the MHP rats.

conclusionOur results indicated that pregnancy- associated diabetes- induced similar structural adaptations in the RAM of women and rats with slight alterations in fiber type number and area. These findings suggest that the MHP rat model can be used for studying the effects of pregnancy-associated diabetes on the fiber structure of RAM.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalRectus AbdominisAdultAnimalsBody WeightDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFetusGlucose Tolerance TestHumansPregnancyRats, Wistar

Identifiers

PMID32243473
PMCPMC7122752
OpenAlexW3014773013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.