Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32243466›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Silicon-induced changes in plant volatiles reduce attractiveness of wheat to the bird cherry-oat aphid Rhopalosiphum padi and attract the parasitoid Lysiphlebus testaceipes.

Reinaldo Silva de Oliveira, Maria Fernanda G V Peñaflor, Felipe G Gonçalves, Marcus Vinicius Sampaio, Ana Paula Korndörfer, Weliton D Silva, José Maurício S Bento

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Soil nutrition and foliar intervention inFrontiers in insect science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Biomass Sorghum (Insects · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anti-herbivore activity of soluble silicon for crop protection in agriculture: a review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Reinaldo Silva de OliveiraInstituto de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
Maria Fernanda G V PeñaflorDepartamento de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8240-8840
Felipe G GonçalvesDepartamento de Entomologia e Acarologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Marcus Vinicius SampaioInstituto de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
Ana Paula KorndörferInstituto de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
Weliton D SilvaDepartamento de Entomologia e Acarologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9035-204X
José Maurício S BentoDepartamento de Entomologia e Acarologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8655-5178

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silicon (Si) supplementation is well-known for enhancing plant resistance to insect pests, however, only recently studies revealed that Si accumulation in the plant not only confers a mechanical barrier to insect feeding, but also primes jasmonic acid-dependent defenses. Here, we examined whether Si supplementation alters wheat volatile emissions that influence the bird cherry-oat aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi) olfactory preference and the aphid parasitoid Lysiphlebus testaceipes. Even though Si accumulation in wheat did not impact aphid performance, we found that R. padi preferred constitutive volatiles from-Si wheat over those emitted by +Si wheat plants. In Y-tube olfactometer bioassays, the parasitoid was attracted to volatiles from +Si uninfested wheat, but not to those from-Si uninfested wheat. +Si and-Si aphid-infested plants released equally attractive blends to the aphid parasitoid; however, wasps were unable to distinguish +Si uninfested plant odors from those of aphid-infested treatments. GC-MS analyses revealed that +Si uninfested wheat plants emitted increased amounts of a single compound, geranyl acetone, compared to -Si uninfested wheat, but similar to those emitted by aphid-infested treatments. By contrast, Si supplementation in wheat did not alter composition of aphid-induced plant volatiles. Our results show that changes in wheat volatile blend induced by Si accumulation mediate the non-preference behavior of the bird cherry-oat aphid and the attraction of its parasitoid L. testaceipes. Conversely to the literature, Si supplementation by itself seems to work as an elicitor of induced defenses in wheat, and not as a priming agent.

Indexed as

AphidsWaspsAnimalsInsect ControlSiliconSmellTriticumVolatile Organic CompoundsSiliconVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID32243466
PMCPMC7122784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.