Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32243448›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Persistent deleterious effects of a deleterious Wolbachia infection.

Perran A Ross, Jason K Axford, Ashley G Callahan, Kelly M Richardson, Ary A Hoffmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Rethinking microbial biopesticide development and uptake.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Cytoplasmic incompatibility factor proteins fromProceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. RevisitingEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  6. Insects · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genomic and Phenotypic Comparisons Reveal Distinct Variants ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Why did theEvolution letters · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. AApplied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Perran A RossPest and Environmental Adaptation Research Group, Bio21 Institute and the School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7645-7523
Jason K AxfordPest and Environmental Adaptation Research Group, Bio21 Institute and the School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Ashley G CallahanPest and Environmental Adaptation Research Group, Bio21 Institute and the School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5045-7840
Kelly M RichardsonPest and Environmental Adaptation Research Group, Bio21 Institute and the School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Ary A HoffmannPest and Environmental Adaptation Research Group, Bio21 Institute and the School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wolbachia are being used to reduce dengue transmission by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes around the world. To date releases have mostly involved Wolbachia strains with limited fitness effects but strains with larger fitness costs could be used to suppress mosquito populations. However, such infections are expected to evolve towards decreased deleterious effects. Here we investigate potential evolutionary changes in the wMelPop infection transferred from Drosophila melanogaster to Aedes aegypti more than ten years (~120 generations) ago. We show that most deleterious effects of this infection have persisted despite strong selection to ameliorate them. The wMelPop-PGYP infection is difficult to maintain in laboratory colonies, likely due to the persistent deleterious effects coupled with occasional maternal transmission leakage. Furthermore, female mosquitoes can be scored incorrectly as infected due to transmission of Wolbachia through mating. Infection loss in colonies was not associated with evolutionary changes in the nuclear background. These findings suggest that Wolbachia transinfections with deleterious effects may have stable phenotypes which could ensure their long-term effectiveness if released in natural populations to reduce population size.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAedesAnimalsDengueDrosophila melanogasterFemaleHost Microbial InteractionsLinear ModelsMaleMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsPest Control, BiologicalPopulation DynamicsWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID32243448
PMCPMC7159649
OpenAlexW3014511440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.