Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32243435›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Diagnostic performance and usability of the VISITECT CD4 semi-quantitative test for advanced HIV disease screening.

Zibusiso Ndlovu, Lamin Massaquoi, Ndim Eugene Bangwen, John N Batumba, Rachelle U Bora, Joelle Mbuaya, Roger Nzadi, Nadine Ntabugi, Patrick Kisaka, Gisele Manciya and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Zibusiso NdlovuSouthern Africa Medical Unit, Médecins Sans Frontiéres, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0386-8641
Lamin MassaquoiMédecins Sans Frontiéres, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.ORCID 0000-0001-5123-7081
Ndim Eugene BangwenMédecins Sans Frontiéres, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
John N BatumbaMédecins Sans Frontiéres, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Rachelle U BoraMédecins Sans Frontiéres, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Joelle MbuayaMédecins Sans Frontiéres, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Roger NzadiMédecins Sans Frontiéres, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Nadine NtabugiMédecins Sans Frontiéres, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Patrick KisakaMédecins Sans Frontiéres, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Gisele ManciyaMédecins Sans Frontiéres, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Ramzia MoudashirouMédecins Sans Frontières, Conakry, Guneia.ORCID 0000-0002-4393-5557
Harry PanganiMédecins Sans Frontières, Nsanje, Malawi.
Patrick MangochiMédecins Sans Frontières, Nsanje, Malawi.
Roberta MakokoMédecins Sans Frontières, Nsanje, Malawi.
David Van LaekenMédecins Sans Frontières, Nsanje, Malawi.
Claude KwitondaMédecins Sans Frontières, Nsanje, Malawi.
Yuster RonohMédecins Sans Frontières, Gutu, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0002-1292-0424
Kuziwa KuwenyiMédecins Sans Frontières, Gutu, Zimbabwe.
Reinaldo OrtunoMédecins Sans Frontières, Gutu, Zimbabwe.
Douglas MangwanyaMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Edmore ZvidzaiMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Tapiwa MupepeMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Sekesai ZinyoweraNational Microbiology Reference Laboratory, Ministry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Emmanuel FajardoMédecins Sans Frontières, Barcelona, Spain.
Tom EllmanSouthern Africa Medical Unit, Médecins Sans Frontiéres, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ministry of Health and Child Welfare · ZWMédecins Sans Frontières · ZAMédecins Sans Frontières · ESMédecins Sans Frontières · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn sub-Saharan Africa, a third of people starting antiretroviral therapy and majority of patients returning to HIV-care after disengagement, present with advanced HIV disease (ADH), and are at high risk of mortality. Simplified and more affordable point-of-care (POC) diagnostics are required to increase access to prompt CD4 cell count screening for ambulatory and asymptomatic patients. The Visitect CD4 Lateral Flow Assay (LFA) is a disposable POC test, providing a visually interpreted result of above or below 200 CD4cells/mm3. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of this index test.

methodsConsenting patients above 18years of age and eligible for CD4 testing were enrolled in Nsanje district hospital (Malawi), Gutu mission hospital (Zimbabwe) and Centre hopitalier de Kabinda (DRC). A total of 708 venous blood samples were tested in the index test and in the BD FACSCount assay (reference test method) in the laboratories (Phase 1) to determine diagnostic accuracy. A total of 433 finger-prick (FP) samples were tested on the index test at POC by clinicians (Phase 2) and a self-completed questionnaire was administered to all testers to explore usability of the index test.

resultsAmong 708 patients, 67.2% were female and median CD4 was 297cells/mm3. The sensitivity of the Visitect CD4 LFA using venous blood in the laboratory was 95.0% [95% CI: 91.3-97.5] and specificity was 81.9% [95% CI: 78.2-85.2%]. Using FP samples, the sensitivity of the Visitect CD4 LFA was 98.3% [95% CI: 95.0-99.6] and specificity was 77.2% [95% CI: 71.6-82.2%]. Usability of the Visitect CD4 LFA was high across the study sites with 97% successfully completed tests. Due to the required specific multiple incubation and procedural steps during the Visitect CD4 LFA testing, few health workers (7/26) were not confident to manage testing whilst multi-tasking in their clinical work.

conclusionsVisitect CD4 LFA is a promising test for decentralized CD4 screening in resource-limited settings, without access to CD4 testing and and it can trigger prompt management of patients with AHD. Lay health cadres should be considered to conduct Visitect CD4 LFA testing in PHCs as well as coordinating all other POC quality assurance.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningAdultCD4 Lymphocyte CountFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMalawiMiddle AgedPoint-of-Care TestingSerologic TestsZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID32243435
PMCPMC7122771
OpenAlexW3014494228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.