ArticleMedicine2020
Treatment for acute flares of gout: A protocol for systematic review.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- RepurposingACS omega · 2026Article
- Transdermal delivery of colchicine using dissolvable microneedle arrays for the treatment of acute gout in a rat model.Drug delivery · 2022Article
- The inflammation process of gout arthritis and its treatment.Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe current evidence confirms the effectiveness and safety of several drug interventions in the treatment of acute flares of gout, however, the most preferred drugs are still unclear. We, therefore, seek to conduct a network meta-analysis that can systematically compare non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), COXIBs, colchicine, hormones, or IL-1 receptor antagonists, etc. for acute gout based on the latest evidence. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Nine online databases are searched with inception to September 1, 2019; there will be no language restrictions on the included trials. Randomized controlled trials that include patients with acute flares of gout receiving drug therapy versus a control group will be included. The selection of studies, risk of bias assessment and data extraction will be conducted by 2 independent researchers. Bayesian network meta-analysis is applied using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method with Stata or R. The dichotomous data will be presented as risk ratios with 95% CIs and the continuous data will be presented as weighted mean differences or standardized mean differences with 95% CIs. Evidence quality will be evaluated using the GRADE system. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This network meta-analysis will not involve private information from personal or imperil their rights, so, ethical approval is not required. The results of this network meta-analysis may be published in a journal or publicized in concerned conferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.