ArticleAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2020
Endothelial-Stromal Communication in Murine and Human Corneas.
Article in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enabling In Vivo Longitudinal Evaluation of Descemet's Membrane Thickness in Wild-type and FECD Mice Using Self-Referenced Optical Coherence Microscopy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Developing stem cells for corneal disease: recent developments and future perspectives.Regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- Posterior Limbal Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Promote Proliferation and Stemness of Transition Zone Cells: A Novel Insight Into Corneal Endothelial Rejuvenation.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Composition, structure and function of the corneal stroma.Experimental eye research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to identify and characterize interactions of corneal endothelial cells with the posterior stroma. Corneal endothelial-stromal interactions were examined in developing postnatal day 3 (P3) and mature postnatal day 30 (P30) C57BL/6 mice and adult human corneas. Flat mounts and cross-sections were studied using immunofluorescence microscopy. F-actin was labeled with phalloidin to evaluate cell processes traversing Descemet's membrane (DM). Dynamic cell-cell communication was evaluated with fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) using calcein acetoxymethyl dye. Endothelial-stromal interactions were observed across the whole cornea transversing DM during early postnatal development (P3), while these interactions became restricted to the periphery in the mature murine cornea (P30). In adult human corneas, endothelial extensions through the DM were observed in the peripheral cornea. The pattern of FRAP in both mature mice and human central corneas demonstrated endothelial-endothelial cell communication. In contrast, in the human cornea 2, distinct patterns were observed consistent with endothelial-endothelial and stromal-endothelial communication. Endothelial-stromal interactions were observed in the entire cornea during early postnatal mouse corneas. This evidence of endothelial-posterior stromal contact contradicts the hypothesis that corneal endothelial cells are isolated from the stroma by the DM and provides direct data to support endothelial-stromal comunication that may directly influence posterior corneal structure and function. Anat Rec, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.