ArticleThe British journal of radiology2020
Age-specific and gender-specific radiation risks in paediatric angiography and interventional cardiology: conversion coefficients and risk reference values.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of ionizing radiation in a Norwegian cohort of children with congenital heart disease: imaging frequency and radiation dose for the Health Effects of Cardiac Fluoroscopy and Modern Radiotherapy in Pediatrics (HARMONIC) study.Pediatric radiology · 2023Article
- Dose Descriptors and Assessment of Risk of Exposure-Induced Death in Patients Undergoing COVID-19 Related Chest Computed Tomography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo estimate risk for exposure-induced cancer death (REID), organ-specific risks of exposure-induced cancer death (REID
methodsThe PCXMC v.2.0 code is used together with exposure-related information from RDSR from a cohort of 238 children to assess cancer risks and related conversion coefficients. The KAP corresponding to 1 in 1000 of increased REID is used to define age-specific and gender-specific KAP values to monitor risk in such patient cohorts, here denoted as RRVs.
resultsThe REID estimates ranged from below 1 up to 300 in 100,000, and the RRVs for the different age groups and gender ranged from 0.77 Gycm
conclusionsProminent risk contributing organs were the lungs and the (female) breast. The concept of age-specific and gender-specific RRVs related to population cancer risk is introduced and is intended to be used as a supporting tool for physicians performing such interventions. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Age-related and gender-related conversion coefficients for radiation risk, CC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.