Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32242623›Full record

ArticleThe Biochemical journal2020

Differential effects of 'resurrecting' Csp pseudoproteases during Clostridioides difficile spore germination.

M Lauren Donnelly, Emily R Forster, Amy E Rohlfing, Aimee Shen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Biochemical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M Lauren DonnellyDepartment of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Emily R ForsterDepartment of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Amy E RohlfingDepartment of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Aimee ShenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Tufts University · US

Funding

Tufts IRACDAK12GM133314 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI CLAIRE L MOORE, Jamie Lynn Maguire · 2019 to 2026
$8.4M
MOLECULAR GENETICS OF BASIC CELL FUNCTIONST32GM007310 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI CAMILLI, ANDREW · 1987 to 2020
$3.9M
Regulation of Spore Germination in Clostridioides difficileR01GM108684 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI Aimee Shen · 2014 to 2026
$3.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM133314NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clostridioides difficile is a spore-forming bacterial pathogen that is the leading cause of hospital-acquired gastroenteritis. C. difficile infections begin when its spore form germinates in the gut upon sensing bile acids. These germinants induce a proteolytic signaling cascade controlled by three members of the subtilisin-like serine protease family, CspA, CspB, and CspC. Notably, even though CspC and CspA are both pseudoproteases, they are nevertheless required to sense germinants and activate the protease, CspB. Thus, CspC and CspA are part of a growing list of pseudoenzymes that play important roles in regulating cellular processes. However, despite their importance, the structural properties of pseudoenzymes that allow them to function as regulators remain poorly understood. Our recently solved crystal structure of CspC revealed that its pseudoactive site residues align closely with the catalytic triad of CspB, suggesting that it might be possible to 'resurrect' the ancestral protease activity of the CspC and CspA pseudoproteases. Here, we demonstrate that restoring the catalytic triad to these pseudoproteases fails to resurrect their protease activity. We further show that the pseudoactive site substitutions differentially affect the stability and function of the CspC and CspA pseudoproteases: the substitutions destabilized CspC and impaired spore germination without affecting CspA stability or function. Thus, our results surprisingly reveal that the presence of a catalytic triad does not necessarily predict protease activity. Since homologs of C. difficile CspA occasionally carry an intact catalytic triad, our results indicate that bioinformatic predictions of enzyme activity may underestimate pseudoenzymes in rare cases.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsCarrier ProteinsCatalysisClostridioides difficileGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalSpores, BacterialBacterial ProteinsCarrier Proteinscold-shock protein CspB, BacteriaCspA protein, ClostridiumCspC protein, ClostridiumClostridioides difficileClostridium difficilepseudoenzymepseudoproteasespore germinationsubtilisin-like serine protease

Identifiers

PMID32242623
PMCPMC7200643
OpenAlexW3014365000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.