Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32242467›Full record

ArticleClinical linguistics & phonetics2021

Auditory-perceptual acuity in rhotic misarticulation: baseline characteristics and treatment response.

Laine Cialdella, Heather Kabakoff, Jonathan Preston, Sarah Dugan, Caroline Spencer, Suzanne Boyce, Mark Tiede, D Whalen, Tara McAllister

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Online Assessment and Enhancement of Auditory Perception for Residual /ɹ/ Distortions.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Auditory and Somatosensory Development for Speech in Later Childhood.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023
    Article
  6. Tutorial: Using Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback for Speech Sound Training.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Laine CialdellaDepartment of Communicative Sciences & Disorders, New York University , New York, NY, USA.
Heather KabakoffDepartment of Communicative Sciences & Disorders, New York University , New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6072-5850
Jonathan PrestonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Syracuse University , Syracuse, NY, USA.
Sarah DuganDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1063-7422
Caroline SpencerDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Suzanne BoyceHaskins Laboratories , New Haven, CT, USA.
Mark TiedeHaskins Laboratories , New Haven, CT, USA.
D WhalenProgram in Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, City University of New York Graduate Center , New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3974-0084
Tara McAllisterDepartment of Communicative Sciences & Disorders, New York University , New York, NY, USA.
Haskins Laboratories · USNew York University · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Biofeedback-Enhanced Treatment for Speech Sound Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial and Delineation of Sensorimotor SubtypesR01DC017476 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Tara McAllister · 2019 to 2026
$5.3M
Improving clinical speech remediation with ultrasound technologyR01DC013668 · NIDCD · CUNY GRADUATE SCH AND UNIV CTR · PI BOYCE, SUZANNE ELIZABETH, WHALEN, DOUGLAS H · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
Reduction in spread of excitation as predictor multi-channel spectral resolutionR01DC012152 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LANDSBERGER, DAVID M · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
Ultrasound Biofeedback for Therapy-Resistant Speech Sound Disorders in ChildrenR03DC013152 · NIDCD · SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY · PI PRESTON, JONATHAN · 2013 to 2015
$497k
Establishing the Role of Sensorimotor Skills in Speech Development and DisordersF31DC018197 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI KABAKOFF, HEATHER M · 2019 to 2020
$55k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC018197NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012152NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013668NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017476NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rhotic sound /r/ is one of the latest-emerging sounds in English, and many children receive treatment for residual errors affecting /r/ that persist past the age of 9. Auditory-perceptual abilities of children with residual speech errors are thought to be different from their typically developing peers. This study examined auditory-perceptual acuity in children with residual speech errors affecting /r/ and the relation of these skills to production accuracy, both before and after a period of treatment incorporating visual biofeedback. Identification of items along an /r/-/w/ continuum was assessed prior to treatment. Production accuracy for /r/ was acoustically measured from standard/r/stimulability probes elicited before and after treatment. Fifty-nine children aged 9-15 with residual speech errors (RSE) affecting /r/ completed treatment, and forty-eight age-matched controls who completed the same auditory-perceptual task served as a comparison group. It was hypothesized that children with RSE would show lower auditory-perceptual acuity than typically developing speakers and that higher auditory-perceptual acuity would be associated with more accurate production before treatment. It was also hypothesized that auditory-perceptual acuity would serve as a mediator of treatment response. Results indicated that typically developing children have more acute perception of the /r/-/w/ contrast than children with RSE. Contrary to hypothesis, baseline auditory-perceptual acuity for /r/ did not predict baseline production severity. For baseline auditory-perceptual acuity in relation to biofeedback efficacy, there was an interaction between auditory-perceptual acuity and gender, such that higher auditory-perceptual acuity was associated with greater treatment response in female, but not male, participants.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionSpeech Sound DisorderArticulation DisordersAuditory PerceptionChildFemaleHumansSpeechSpeech TherapyPerceptionpersonalized learningresidual speech errorsrhotic misarticulation

Identifiers

PMID32242467
PMCPMC7541403
OpenAlexW3014985242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.