ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2020
Automatic intraoperative optical coherence tomography positioning.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of three fundus inspection methods during phacoemulsification in diabetic white cataract.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Automatic evaluation of graft orientation during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty using intraoperative OCT.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- What Is the Impact of Intraoperative Microscope-Integrated OCT in Ophthalmic Surgery? Relevant Applications and Outcomes. A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIntraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) was recently introduced as a new modality for ophthalmic surgeries. It provides real-time cross-sectional information at a very high resolution. However, properly positioning the scan location during surgery is cumbersome and time-consuming, as a surgeon needs both his hands for surgery. The goal of the present study is to present a method to automatically position an iOCT scan on an anatomy of interest in the context of anterior segment surgeries.
methodsFirst, a voice recognition algorithm using a context-free grammar is used to obtain the desired pose from the surgeon. Then, the limbus circle is detected in the microscope image and the iOCT scan is placed accordingly in the X-Y plane. Next, an iOCT sweep in Z direction is conducted and the scan is placed to centre the topmost structure. Finally, the position is fine-tuned using semantic segmentation and a rule-based system.
resultsThe logic to position the scan location on various anatomies was evaluated on ex vivo porcine eyes (10 eyes for corneal apex and 7 eyes for cornea, sclera and iris). The mean euclidean distances (± standard deviation) was 76.7 (± 59.2) pixels and 0.298 (± 0.229) mm. The mean execution time (± standard deviation) in seconds for the four anatomies was 15 (± 1.2). The scans have a size of 1024 by 1024 pixels. The method was implemented on a Carl Zeiss OPMI LUMERA 700 with RESCAN 700.
conclusionThe present study introduces a method to fully automatically position an iOCT scanner. Providing the possibility of changing the OCT scan location via voice commands removes the burden of manual device manipulation from surgeons. This in turn allows them to keep their focus on the surgical task at hand and therefore increase the acceptance of iOCT in the operating room.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.