Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32242007›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Exome sequencing of familial high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma reveals heterogeneity for rare candidate susceptibility genes.

Deepak N Subramanian, Magnus Zethoven, Simone McInerny, James A Morgan, Simone M Rowley, Jue Er Amanda Lee, Na Li, Kylie L Gorringe, Paul A James, Ian G Campbell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exome sequencing identifiesmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. The role ofJournal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Olaparib-ResistantCells · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Is Reflex GermlineCancers · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Deepak N SubramanianCancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0891-9324
Magnus ZethovenBioinformatics Core Facility, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Simone McInernyThe Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
James A MorganThe Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8595-5372
Simone M RowleyCancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Jue Er Amanda LeeCancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4273-5238
Na LiCancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1578-9561
Kylie L GorringeSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5681-2022
Paul A JamesCancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4361-4657
Ian G CampbellCancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. ian.campbell@petermac.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7773-4155
The University of Melbourne · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) has a significant hereditary component, approximately half of which cannot be explained by known genes. To discover genes, we analyse germline exome sequencing data from 516 BRCA1/2-negative women with HGSOC, focusing on genes enriched with rare, protein-coding loss-of-function (LoF) variants. Overall, there is a significant enrichment of rare protein-coding LoF variants in the cases (p < 0.0001, chi-squared test). Only thirty-four (6.6%) have a pathogenic variant in a known or proposed predisposition gene. Few genes have LoF mutations in more than four individuals and the majority are detected in one individual only. Forty-three highly-ranked genes are identified with three or more LoF variants that are enriched by three-fold or more compared to GnomAD. These genes represent diverse functional pathways with relatively few involved in DNA repair, suggesting that much of the remaining heritability is explained by previously under-explored genes and pathways.

Indexed as

ExomeGenetic HeterogeneityGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCystadenocarcinoma, SerousExome SequencingFemaleHumansLoss of Function MutationMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32242007
PMCPMC7118163
OpenAlexW3014592106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.