Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32241826›Full record

ArticleBMJ sexual & reproductive health2020

Normalising abortion: what role can health professionals play?

Karen J Maxwell, Lesley Hoggart, Fiona Bloomer, Sam Rowlands, Carrie Purcell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ sexual & reproductive health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karen J MaxwellMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2264-6510
Lesley HoggartFaculty of Health and Social Care, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4786-7950
Fiona BloomerInstitute for Research in Social Sciences, Ulster University-Jordanstown Campus, Newtownabbey, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3347-6403
Sam RowlandsFaculty of Health and Social Science, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5940-9079
Carrie PurcellMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK carrie.purcell@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2651-9201

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU11Chief Scientist Office SPHSU18Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/11Wellcome Trust 207878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite being a common gynaecological procedure, abortion continues to be widely stigmatised. The research and medical communities are increasingly considering ways of reducing stigma, and health professionals have a role to play in normalising abortion as part of routine sexual and reproductive healthcare (SRH). We sought to investigate how health professionals may normalise abortion and challenge prevailing negative sociocultural narratives.

methodsAs part of the Sexuality and Abortion Stigma Study (SASS), qualitative secondary analysis was conducted on two datasets containing health professionals' accounts of providing abortion in Scotland and England. A subsample of 20 interviews were subjected to in-depth, thematic analysis.

resultsFour key themes were identified in heath professionals' accounts: (1) encountering resistance to abortion from others working in SRH; (2) contending with prevailing negative sociocultural narratives of abortion; (3) enacting overt positivity towards abortion provision; and (4) presenting abortion as part of normal, routine healthcare.

conclusionsIt is clear that negative attitudes toward abortion persist both inside and outside of healthcare systems, and need to be challenged in order to destigmatise those accessing and providing services. Health professionals can play a key role in normalising abortion, through the ways in which they frame their work and present abortion to women they treat, and others more widely. Our analysis suggests a key way to achieve this is by presenting abortion as part of normal, routine SRH, but that appropriate support and structural change are essential for normalisation to become embedded.

Indexed as

abortionnormalisationqualitative researchreproductive health politicsstigma

Identifiers

PMID32241826
PMCPMC7611714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.