Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32241583›Full record

SynthesisPatient education and counseling2020

The evidence supporting educational videos for patients and caregivers receiving hospice and palliative care: A systematic review.

Dulce M Cruz-Oliver, Angel Pacheco Rueda, Liliana Viera-Ortiz, Karla T Washington, Debra Parker Oliver

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Patient education and counseling, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Advance Care Planning in Serious Illness: A Narrative Review.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dulce M Cruz-OliverPalliative Medicine Program, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Suite 342B, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. Electronic address: dcruzoli@jhmi.edu.
Angel Pacheco RuedaUniversity of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus, School of Medicine, Box 365067, San Juan, 00936-5067, Puerto Rico. Electronic address: angel.pacheco8@upr.edu.
Liliana Viera-OrtizUniversity of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus, Department of Surgery, Box 365067, San Juan, 00936-5067, Puerto Rico. Electronic address: liliana.viera@upr.edu.
Karla T WashingtonDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri Medical Sciences Building, DC032.00, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA. Electronic address: washingtonkar@health.missouri.edu.
Debra Parker OliverDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri Medical Sciences Building, DC032.00, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA. Electronic address: oliverdr@health.missouri.edu.

Funding

ACCESS_Access for Cancer Caregivers to Education and Support for Shared decisionmakingR01CA203999 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PARKER OLIVER, DEBRA · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA203999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study is to explore the evidence surrounding educational videos for patients and family caregivers in hospice and palliative care. We ask three research questions: 1. What is the evidence for video interventions? 2. What is the quality of the evidence behind video interventions? 3. What are the outcomes of video interventions?

methodsThe study is a systematic review, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Researchers systematically searched five databases for experimental and observational studies on the evidence supporting video education for hospice and palliative care patients and caregivers, published in 1969-2019.

resultsThe review identified 31 relevant articles with moderate-high quality of evidence. Most studies were experimental (74 %), came from the United States (84 %) and had a mean sample size of 139 participants. Studies showed that video interventions positively affect preferences of care and advance care planning, provide emotional support, and serve as decision and information aids.

conclusionA strong body of evidence has emerged for video education interventions in hospice and palliative care. Additional research assessing video interventions' impact on clinical outcomes is needed. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Videos are a promising tool for patient and family education in hospice and palliative care.

Indexed as

Hospice CarePalliative CareAudiovisual AidsCaregiversFamilyHealth EducationHospice and Palliative Care NursingHumansPatient Education as TopicTerminal CareVideo RecordingAudiovisual aidCaregiverCarerEducationHospice and palliative medicineInterventionPatientSystematic reviewVideo

Identifiers

PMID32241583
PMCPMC7495206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.