Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32241483›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

Alternative sanitizers to paraformaldehyde for incubation of fertile eggs.

Gabriel da S Oliveira, Vinícius M Dos Santos, Sheila T Nascimento, Jullyana C Rodrigues

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Control ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Biomolecule screen identifies several inhibitors ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  8. Avian PathogenicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriel da S OliveiraFaculty of Agronomy and Veterinary (FAV), University of Brasília, Brasília 70.910-900, DF, Brazil.
Vinícius M Dos SantosLaboratory of Poultry Science, Federal Institute of Brasília - Campus Planaltina, Brasília 73.380-900, DF, Brazil. Electronic address: vinicius.santos@ifb.edu.br.
Sheila T NascimentoFaculty of Agronomy and Veterinary (FAV), University of Brasília, Brasília 70.910-900, DF, Brazil.
Jullyana C RodriguesLaboratory of Poultry Science, Federal Institute of Brasília - Campus Planaltina, Brasília 73.380-900, DF, Brazil.
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Brasília · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate an ethanolic extract of propolis and clove essential oil as a substitute for paraformaldehyde for the sanitation of fertile eggs. In total, 1,800 hatching eggs (from 40-week-old CPK [Pesadão Vermelho] breeder hens) were randomly distributed among the treatments (grain alcohol, clove essential oil, ethanolic extract of propolis, and paraformaldehyde). Spraying was the application method for all treatments except for paraformaldehyde, for which fumigation was used. The experimental design was a randomized block design with 4 treatments. Analysis of the incubation parameters was based on 6 replications per treatment. The egg weight loss was lower in the eggs treated with ethanolic extract of propolis (8.59 ± 3.34%) than in the eggs treated with grain alcohol (13.40 ± 2.87%), clove essential oil (12.96 ± 3.33%), and paraformaldehyde (13.05 ± 3.24%). The hatchability of the fertile eggs (51.39 ± 5.81%) and the hatchability of the set eggs (44.74 ± 6.79%) were negatively affected by the application of ethanolic extract of propolis. Late mortality of eggs treated was higher than early mortality in the grain alcohol (12.14 ± 4.72%; 2.86 ± 3.30%), clove essential oil (4.60 ± 5.95%; 3.03 ± 3.50%), and ethanolic extract of propolis (36.63 ± 6.60%, 11.98 ± 4.30%) treatments. The eggs treated with clove essential oil (67.90 ± 1.87%), paraformaldehyde (67.80 ± 1.85%), or grain alcohol (67.50 ± 1.92%) presented chick yields as expected. However, despite the ideal yield of eggs treated with ethanolic extract of propolis (69.25 ± 1.68%), its application at the concentration used in the present research is not recommended. Clove essential oil, when sprayed on fertile eggs as a sanitizing agent, did not differ from paraformaldehyde in relation to hatchery performance parameters.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChickensClove OilFormaldehydeOvumPolymersPropolisRandom AllocationAnti-Infective Agents, LocalClove OilFormaldehydeparaformPolymersPropolisclove essential oilfertile eggsgrain alcoholhatching resultspropolis

Identifiers

PMID32241483
PMCPMC7587769
OpenAlexW3003729526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.