ReviewAdvances in cancer research2020
Project PLACE: Enhancing community and academic partnerships to describe and address health disparities.
Review in Advances in cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community engagement in the context of cancer: scoping review of definitions and measures to inform program-level analysis.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- A qualitative evaluation of the Research Equity and Diversity Initiative's (READI) research support voucher program and its community engagement support.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Collaborating to Leverage American Heart Association's EmPOWERED to Serve Faith-Based Networks for Methamphetamine and Stimulant Misuse Educational Campaign in Black and Hispanic Churches.Psychiatric research and clinical practice · 2025Article
- Interinstitutional Approach to Advancing Geospatial Technologies for US Cancer Centers.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
- Building a Community Partnership for the Development of Health Ministries Within the African American Community: The Triad Pastors Network.Journal of community health · 2024Article
- Social determinants of health-based strategies to address vaccination disparities through a university-public health partnership.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Modifiable patient-reported factors associated with cancer-screening knowledge and participation in a community-based health assessment.American journal of surgery · 2023Article
- Reimagining diversity in multiple myeloma clinical trials.Hematological oncology · 2022Article
- From Cancer Epidemiology to Policy and Practice: the Role of a Comprehensive Cancer Center.Current epidemiology reports · 2022Review
- Association of Smartphone Ownership and Internet Use With Markers of Health Literacy and Access: Cross-sectional Survey Study of Perspectives From Project PLACE (Population Level Approaches to Cancer Elimination).Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Rural barriers to early lung cancer detection: Exploring access to lung cancer screening programs in New Hampshire and Vermont.American journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Applying a Nursing Perspective to Address the Challenges Experienced by Cisgender Women in the HIV Status Neutral Care Continuum: A Review of the Literature.The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care : JANACReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Achieving cancer health equity is a national imperative. Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States and in North Carolina (NC), where the disease disproportionately impacts traditionally underrepresented race and ethnic groups, those who live in rural communities, the impoverished, and medically disenfranchised and/or health-disparate populations at high-risk for cancer. These populations have worse cancer outcomes and are less likely to be participants in clinical research and trials. It is critical for cancer centers and other academic health centers to understand the factors that contribute to poor cancer outcomes, the extent to which they impact the cancer burden, and develop effective interventions to address them. Key to this process is engaging diverse stakeholders in the development and execution of community and population health assessments, and the subsequent programs and interventions designed to address the need across the catchment area. This chapter describes the processes and lessons learned of the Duke Cancer Institute's (DCI) long standing community partnerships that led to Project PLACE (Population Level Approaches to Cancer Elimination), a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-funded community health assessment reaching 2315 respondents in 7 months, resulting in a community partnered research agenda to advance cancer equity within the DCI catchment area. We illustrate the application of a community partnered health assessment and offer examples of strategic opportunities, successes, lessons learned, and implications for practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.