Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32241387›Full record

ReviewAdvances in cancer research2020

Patient barriers to cancer clinical trial participation and navigator activities to assist.

Kathleen B Cartmell, Heather S Bonilha, Kit N Simpson, Marvella E Ford, Debbie C Bryant, Anthony J Alberg

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
37.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Barrier resolution via patient navigation in the context of cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Perceptions of health research participation in rural and urban Pennsylvanians.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. What Is Ailing Oncology Clinical Trials? Can We Fix Them?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Addressing transportation barriers in oncology: existing programs and new solutions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kathleen B CartmellDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States; Medical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, United States. Electronic address: kcartme@clemson.edu.
Heather S BonilhaMedical University of South Carolina, College of Health Professions, Charleston, SC, United States.
Kit N SimpsonMedical University of South Carolina, College of Health Professions, Charleston, SC, United States.
Marvella E FordProfessor, Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States; Associate Director, Population Sciences and Cancer Disparities, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC United States; SmartState Endowed Chair in Cancer Disparities Research, South Carolina State University, Orangeburg, SC, United States.
Debbie C BryantDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States; Medical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, United States.
Anthony J AlbergUniversity of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, United States.
Medical University of South Carolina · USClemson University · USSouth Carolina State University · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

Translational Science Laboratory Shared ResourceP30CA138313 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI RAYMOND N. DUBOIS · 2009 to 2026
$42.7M
Medical University of South Carolina NCORP Minority/Underserved Community SiteUG1CA189848 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Marvella Elizabeth Ford, Evan Michael Graboyes · 2014 to 2026
$11.0M
South Carolina Cancer Disparities Research Center (SC CADRE)U54CA210962 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI TURNER, DAVID PAUL · 2017 to 2023
$6.7M
South Carolina Cancer Disparities Research Center (SC CaDRe)U54CA210963 · NCI · SOUTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WARSHAMANA-GREENE, GNANA SAKUNTALA · 2017 to 2023
$6.1M
Improving Resection Rates among African Americans with NSCLCR01MD005892 · NIMHD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI ESNAOLA, NESTOR F., FORD, MARVELLA ELIZABETH · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
South Carolina Center Health Equity Consortium (SC CHEC): Summer Undergraduate Research Training Program – Administrative SupplementR25CA193088 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI FORD, MARVELLA ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2020
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA193088NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210962NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210963NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189848NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD005892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical research is vital to the discovery of new cancer treatments that can enhance health and prolong life for cancer patients, but breakthroughs in cancer treatment are limited by challenges recruiting patients into cancer clinical trials (CT). Only 3-5% of cancer patients in the United States participate in a cancer CT and there are disparities in CT participation by age, race and gender. Strategies such as patient navigation, which is designed to provide patients with education and practical support, may help to overcome challenges of CT recruitment. The current study evaluated an intervention in which lay navigators were utilized to provide patient education and practical support for helping patients overcome barriers to CT participation and related clinical care. A patient barrier checklist was utilized to record patient barriers to CT participation and care, actions taken by navigators to assist patients with these barriers, and whether or not these barriers could be overcome. Forty patients received patient navigation services. The most common barriers faced by navigated patients were fear (n=9), issues communicating with medical personnel (n=9), insurance issues (n=8), transportation difficulties (n=6) and perceptions about providers and treatment (n=4). The most common activities undertaken by navigators were making referrals and contacts on behalf of patients (e.g., support services, family, clinicians; n=25). Navigators also made arrangement for transportation, financial, medication and equipment services for patients (n=11) and proactively navigated patients (n=8). Barriers that were not overcome for two or more patients included insurance issues, lack of temporary housing resources for patients in treatment and assistance with household bills. The wide array of patient barriers to CT participation and navigator assistance documented in this study supports the CT navigator role in facilitating quality care.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationClinical Trials as TopicHumansMinority GroupsNeoplasmsPatient NavigationBarriers to careCancerClinical trialsHealth disparitiesPatient navigationRecruitmentRetention

Identifiers

PMID32241387
PMCPMC8623462
OpenAlexW3008942756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.