ArticleBMC pediatrics2020
High inter-observer reliability in standardized ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue in children aged three to six years.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- New Proposal in the Approach to Brachial Remodeling: The Melfa-Anastasia Arm Laxity System (MAALS).Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
- A Decade of Progress in Ultrasound Assessments of Subcutaneous and Total Body Fat: A Scoping Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Ultrasound for assessing paediatric body composition and nutritional status: Scoping review and future directions.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025Article
- Ultrasound assessment of malnutrition in infancy: a pilot case-control study.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- Health and Academic Performance With Happy Children: A Controlled Longitudinal Study Based on the HOPP Project.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Relative Body Weight and Standardised Brightness-Mode Ultrasound Measurement of Subcutaneous Fat in Athletes: An International Multicentre Reliability Study, Under the Auspices of the IOC Medical Commission.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA procedure to measure subcutaneous adipose (SAT) using brightness-mode ultrasound has recently been standardized and applied to various groups of adults including underweight, overweight and obese adults. High reliability of this procedure was found in each of the examined groups. The purpose of this study was to determine inter-observer reliability of the standardized brightness-mode ultrasound measurement of uncompressed SAT in three to six-year-old children.
methodsThree experienced observers independently captured the ultrasound images at the eight standardized measurement sites in each of the 20 children and evaluated their images using an interactive software that detects the SAT contour and automatically measures multiple thicknesses in each image; the mean of these represents SAT thickness at a given site. The children were aged 4.9 ± 1.0 years; their body mass index ranged from 13.6-17.7 kgm
resultsSAT thickness sums with fibrous structures included (D
conclusionsInter-observer results in children are comparable to previously described high reliability in adults. This method, which provides a technical thickness measurement accuracy of about 0.1 to 0.2 mm, enables monitoring of subcutaneous adipose tissue in children with a similarly high reliability as was obtained in adults previously.
trial registrationGerman Institute of Medical Documentation and Information, German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) ID: DRKS00010089; Date 24/02/2016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.