Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32241014›Full record

ArticleMedical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre2020

Bleeding Index and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 as Gingival Inflammation Parameters after Chemical-Mechanical Retraction Procedure.

Marko Igic, Milena Kostic, Jelena Basic, Nebojsa Krunic, Ana Pejcic, Nikola Gligorijevic, Aleksandra Milic Lemic

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marko IgicDepartment of Prosthodontics, Medical Faculty, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia, saigic@yahoo.com.
Milena KosticDepartment of Prosthodontics, Medical Faculty, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia.
Jelena BasicDepartment of Biochemistry, Medical Faculty, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia.
Nebojsa KrunicDepartment of Prosthodontics, Medical Faculty, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia.
Ana PejcicDepartment of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Medical Faculty, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia.
Nikola GligorijevicDepartment of Prosthodontics, Medical Faculty, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia.
Aleksandra Milic LemicDepartment of Prosthodontics, Dental School, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
University of Nis · RSUniversity of Belgrade · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA widely used chemical-mechanical method of gingival retraction can cause gingival tissue damage. The aim of this study was to test the influence of the chemical-mechanical gingival retraction procedures on the gingival bleeding index (GBI) and the salivary concentration of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) as an indicator of inflammatory changes in the gingiva. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe effects of 2 different retraction agents (aluminum chloride and ferric sulfate) were compared, particularly their tissue damaging effect during tooth preparation. Therefore, GBI values and the salivary concentration of MCP-1 were assessed during the chemical-mechanical method of gingival retraction in a homogenous group of respondents. The subjects (n = 60) were divided into 2 experimental groups (G1 and G2) regarding the need for tooth preparing and making artificial crowns. Each group was further divided into 2 subgroups (R1 and R2) according to the type of the gingival retraction agent used (aluminum chloride and ferric sulfate).

resultsCompared to the values at the study start, a statistically significant increase in GBI and salivary MCP-1 (p < 0.001) 1 day after gingival retraction agent application was observed in both experimental groups. After 72 h, the values were lower than in the second observation period but still statistically significantly higher compared to the study start (p < 0.001), which indicated the reversibility of the tissue changes.

conclusionHigher values of the investigated parameters were observed in the group of subjects with prepared teeth, and clinical changes were more pronounced after the use of ferric sulfate.

Indexed as

AdultAluminum ChlorideChemokine CCL2FemaleFerric CompoundsGingival Retraction TechniquesGingivitisHumansInflammationMalePeriodontal IndexSalivaYoung AdultAluminum ChlorideChemokine CCL2Ferric Compoundsferric sulfateAstringentGingival bleeding indexInflammationMCP-1Monocyte chemoattractant proteinRetraction

Identifiers

PMID32241014
PMCPMC7511686
OpenAlexW3014402630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.