Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32240909›Full record

Trial reportRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2020

Compliance and tolerability of short-course radiotherapy followed by preoperative chemotherapy and surgery for high-risk rectal cancer - Results of the international randomized RAPIDO-trial.

Maxime J M van der Valk, Corrie A M Marijnen, Boudewijn van Etten, Esmée A Dijkstra, Denise E Hilling, Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg, Hein Putter, Annet G H Roodvoets, Renu R Bahadoer, Tone Fokstuen and 11 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 105 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01558921 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

Randomized Multicentre Phase III Study of Short Course Radiation Therapy Followed by Prolonged Pre-operative Chemotherapy and Surgery in Primary High Risk Rectal Cancer Compared to Standard Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery and Optional Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2011 to 2026Enrolled920ConditionsRectal CancerArmsM1 scheme, standard long course chemoradiotherapy
NCT04925154 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

PATHOS Tradeoffs in Patient Decision Making About Rectal Cancer Treatment: Benefits Compared to Quality Of Life.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish General HospitalRan2021 to 2028Enrolled192ConditionsPatient PreferenceArmsThe only intervention will be the information brochure that will be given after the first questionnaire.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 207 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Conversations in rectal cancer treatment: a qualitative study of multidisciplinary clinician perspective into non-operative management decision-making discussions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Maxime J M van der ValkDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands. Electronic address: mvandervalk@lumc.nl.
Corrie A M MarijnenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Boudewijn van EttenDepartment of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Esmée A DijkstraDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Denise E HillingDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Elma Meershoek-Klein KranenbargDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Hein PutterDepartment of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Annet G H RoodvoetsDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Renu R BahadoerDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Tone FokstuenDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Albert Jan Ten TijeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Jaume CapdevilaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Vall Hebron University Hospital, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO). Barcelona, Spain.
Mathijs P HendriksDepartment of Medical Oncology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Ibrahim EdhemovicDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Andrès M R CervantesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Spain.
Derk Jan A de GrootDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Per J NilssonDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bengt GlimeliusDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Cornelis J H van de VeldeDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Geke A P HospersDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: g.a.p.hospers@umcg.nl.
Collaborative investigators
Leiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLKarolinska Institutet · SEAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana · SINorthwest Hospital · USUppsala University · SEVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision is widely accepted as the standard of care for high-risk rectal cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy is advised in several international guidelines, although the survival benefit remains unclear and compliance is poor. The current multidisciplinary approach has led to major improvements in local control, yet the occurrence of distant metastases has not decreased accordingly. The combination of short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and chemotherapy in the waiting period before surgery might have several benefits, including higher compliance, downstaging and better effect of systemic therapy.

methodsThis is an investigator-initiated, international multicentre randomized phase III trial. High-risk rectal cancer patients were randomized to SCRT followed by chemotherapy (6 cycles CAPOX or alternatively 9 cycles FOLFOX4) and subsequent surgery, or long-course radiotherapy (25-28 × 2-1.8 Gy) with concomitant capecitabine followed by surgery and optional postoperative chemotherapy (8 cycles CAPOX or 12 cycles FOLFOX4) according to local institutions' policy. The primary endpoint is time to disease-related treatment failure. Here, we report the compliance, toxicity and postoperative complications in both study groups.

findingsBetween June 2011 and June 2016, 920 patients were enrolled. Of these, 901 were evaluable (460 in the experimental arm and 441 in the standard arm). All patients in the experimental arm received 5 × 5 Gy radiotherapy, and 84% of all patients received at least 75% of the prescribed chemotherapy. In the standard arm, the compliance for CRT was 93% and 58% for postoperative chemotherapy. Toxicity ≥grade 3 occurred in 48% of patients in the experimental arm, compared to 25% of patients in the standard arm during preoperative treatment and 35% of patients during postoperative chemotherapy. No statistically significant differences in surgical procedures or postoperative complications were observed.

interpretationHigh compliance (84%) of preoperative systemic treatment could be achieved with the experimental approach. Although considerable toxicity was observed during preoperative therapy, this did not lead to differences in surgical procedures or postoperative complications. Longer follow-up time is needed to assess the primary endpoint and related outcomes.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsRectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyChemotherapy, AdjuvantFluorouracilHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingTreatment OutcomeFluorouracilChemotherapyMultimodal treatmentPreoperative radiotherapyRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID32240909
OpenAlexW3014994169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.