Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32240562›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2020

An Open-Label Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Tag-7 Gene-Modified Tumor Cells-Based Vaccine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Malignant Melanoma or Renal Cell Cancer.

Aleksei Viktorovich Novik, Anna Borisovna Danilova, Maksim Ivanovich Sluzhev, Tatiana Leonidovna Nehaeva, Sergei Sergeevich Larin, Dmitry Viktorovich Girdyuk, Svetlana Anatolevna Protsenko, Anna Igorevna Semenova, Aleksei Olegovich Danilov, Vladimir Mikhailovich Moiseyenko and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aleksei Viktorovich NovikDepartment of Oncoimmunology, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Anna Borisovna DanilovaDepartment of Oncoimmunology, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Maksim Ivanovich SluzhevDepartment of Oncology, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Tatiana Leonidovna NehaevaDepartment of Oncoimmunology, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Sergei Sergeevich LarinLaboratory of Gene Therapy, Institute of Gene Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Dmitry Viktorovich GirdyukDepartment of Oncoimmunology, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Svetlana Anatolevna ProtsenkoDepartment of Chemotherapy and Innovative Technologies, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Anna Igorevna SemenovaDepartment of Oncoimmunology, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Aleksei Olegovich DanilovLaboratory of Clinical Diagnostic, Clinical and Research Center of Specialized Types of Medical Care (Oncological), St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Vladimir Mikhailovich MoiseyenkoClinical and Research Center of Specialized Types of Medical Care (Oncological), St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Georgii Pavlovich GeorgievInstitute of Gene Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Irina Aleksandrovna BalduevaDepartment of Oncoimmunology, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Institute of Gene Biology · RUState Budget Institution of Health St. Petersburg Clinical Research Center Specialized Types of Medical Care · RUFirst Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg · RUSaint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lessons learnedThis study showed that carefully selected patients with locally advanced and metastatic forms of malignant melanoma and renal cell carcinoma could potentially have long-term disease control with a tag-7 gene-modified tumor cells-based vaccine. Randomized clinical trials in patients whose tumors produce low amounts of immunosuppressive factors are needed to confirm this hypothesis in both the adjuvant and metastatic settings.

backgroundImmunotherapy may produce long-lasting effects on survival and toxicity. The magnitude of efficacy may be dependent on immune factors. We analyzed the results of a phase I/II study of a tag-7 gene-modified tumor cells-based vaccine (GMV) in patients with malignant melanoma (MM) or renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with biomarker analysis of immunosuppressive factors (ISFs) production by their tumor cells.

methodsFrom 2001 to 2014, 80 patients received GMV: 68 with MM and 12 with RCC. Treatment in the metastatic setting included 61 patients (MM, 51; RCC, 10), and treatment in the adjuvant setting (after complete cytoreduction) included 19 patients (MM, 17; RCC, 2). Twenty-six patients were stage III (33%), and 54 (67%) were stage IV. The patients' tumor samples were transferred to culture, transfected with tag-7 gene, and inactivated by radiation. The produced product was injected subcutaneously every 3 weeks until progression or 2 years of therapy. ISFs were measured in the supernatants of the tumor cell cultures and used as predictive factors.

resultsNo major safety issues or grade 5 adverse events (AEs) were seen. One grade 4 and two grade 3 AEs were registered. No AEs were registered in 89.4% of treatment cycles. No delayed AE was found. The 5-year overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat population was 25.1%. There were no differences between MM OS and RCC OS (log rank, p = .44). Median OS in the metastatic setting was 0.7 years and in the adjuvant setting was 3.1 years. Classification trees were built on the basis of ISF production (Fig. 1). The median OS was 6.6 years in the favorable prognosis (FP) group (major histocompatibility complex class I polypeptide-related sequence A [MICA] level ≤582 pg/mL, n = 15) and 4.6 months in the unfavorable (UF) group (MICA level >582 pg/mL, n = 12; p < .0001). No significant differences were found between classification trees based on ISFs (transforming growth factor β1 [TGF-β1], interleukin-10 [IL-10], and vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]). In patients with stage III-IV MM with FP, median OS was 2.3 years, with 31% patients alive at 10 years (Fig. 2) in the UF group (0.4 years; log rank, p = 1.94E-5). No FP patients received modern immunotherapy.

conclusionGMV showed high results in carefully selected patients with low ISF (TGF-β1, IL-10, and VEGF) production. The method should be further investigated in patients with FP.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsMelanomaVaccinesHumansVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVaccinesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID32240562
PMCPMC7485366
OpenAlexW3014536325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.