Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32240521›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2020

Critical care providers' support of families in bereavement: a mixed-methods study.

Csilla Kalocsai, Amanda Roze des Ordons, Tasnim Sinuff, Ellen Koo, Orla Smith, Deborah Cook, Eyal Golan, Sarah Hales, George Tomlinson, Derek Strachan and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Communication with bereaved family members after death in the ICU: the CATHARTIC randomised clinical trial.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Csilla KalocsaiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. csilla.kalocsai@camh.ca.
Amanda Roze des OrdonsDivision of Palliative Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Oncology, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Tasnim SinuffInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ellen KooUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Orla SmithSt. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Deborah CookDepartments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Eyal GolanInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sarah HalesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
George TomlinsonUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Derek StrachanUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Christopher J MacKinnonDepartment of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
James DownarDivision of Palliative Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
University Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CACentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAMcGill University · CAMcMaster University · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhen people die in intensive care units (ICUs), as many as half of their family members may experience a severe grief reaction. While families report a need for bereavement support, most ICUs do not routinely follow-up with family members. Clinicians are typically involved in supporting families during death and dying, yet little is known about how they work with families in bereavement. Our goal was to explore how clinicians support bereaved families, identify factors that facilitate and hinder support, and understand their interest and needs for follow-up.

methodsMixed-methods study of nurses and physicians working in one of nine adult medical-surgical ICUs in academic hospitals across Canada. Qualitative interviews followed quantitative surveys to reflect, expand, and explain the quantitative results.

resultsBoth physicians and nurses perceived that they provided empathetic support to bereaved families. Emotional engagement was a crucial element of support, but clinicians were not always able to engage with families because of their roles, responsibilities, experiences, or unit resources. Another important factor that could facilitate or challenge engagement was the degree to which families accepted death. Clinicians were interested in participating in a follow-up bereavement program, but their participation was contingent on time, training, and the ability to manage their own emotions related to death and bereavement in the ICU.

conclusionsMultiple opportunities were identified to enhance current bereavement support for families, including the desire of ICU clinicians for formal follow-up programs. Many psychological, sociocultural, and structural factors would need to be considered in program design.

Indexed as

BereavementCanadaCritical CareFamilyHumansSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32240521
OpenAlexW3014723051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.