Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32240518›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2020

Outcomes of vulnerable elderly patients undergoing elective major surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Han Ting Wang, François Martin Carrier, Anne Tremblay, Marie-Maude Joly, Rafik Ghali, George Heckman, John P Hirdes, Paul Hebert

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Han Ting WangDivision of Internal and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, 5415 boul. L'Assomption, Montreal, QC, Canada. ht.wang85@gmail.com.
François Martin CarrierDepartment of Anesthesia and Department of Medicine, Critical Care Division, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Université de Montréal, Centre de recherche du CHUM, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Anne TremblayDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Marie-Maude JolyDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Rafik GhaliDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
George HeckmanSchlegel Research Institute of Aging and School, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
John P HirdesSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Paul HebertDepartment de Medicine, Université de Montréal et Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont · CACentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAInstitute of Aging · CAUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIdentifying patients at risk of postoperative complications and trying to prevent these complications are the essence of preoperative evaluation. While not overtly frail or disabled, vulnerable patients with mild frailty may be missed by routine assessments and may still have a worse postoperative course.

methodsWe performed a prospective cohort study evaluating vulnerability in older patients undergoing elective surgery. Vulnerability was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale. Our primary outcome was postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS) and our secondary outcome was non-home hospital discharge. We performed multivariable analyses to assess the association between vulnerability and our primary and secondary outcome.

resultsBetween 1 January 2017 and 1 January 2018, 271 older patients with a median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 72 [69-76] yr underwent frailty assessment prior to surgery. Eighty-eight (32.5%) of the cohort were classified as vulnerable. The median [IQR] duration of hospital LOS was 4 [2-7] days for vulnerable patients, 4 [2-6] days for robust patients, and 7 [3-10] days for frail patients. After adjusting for confounders, hospital LOS was not longer for vulnerable patients than for robust patients, but was associated with a higher rate of non-home discharge (odds ratio, 3.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 12.9; P = 0.04).

conclusionsVulnerability was not associated with a longer hospital LOS but with higher risk of non-home discharge. Vulnerable patients might benefit from early identification and advanced planning with earlier transfer to rehabilitation centres.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentAgedFrail ElderlyHumansLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID32240518
OpenAlexW3014164994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.