Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32240480›Full record

Trial reportPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2020

The Effectiveness of the KiVa Bullying Prevention Program in Wales, UK: Results from a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Nick Axford, Gretchen Bjornstad, Suzy Clarkson, Obioha C Ukoumunne, Zoe Wrigley, Justin Matthews, Vashti Berry, Judy Hutchings

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Understanding and Addressing Bullying in Children and Adolescents.Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Facilitators and Barriers to the Sustainability of a School-Based Bullying Prevention Program.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Article
  14. Promoting Learning from Null or Negative Results in Prevention Science Trials.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nick AxfordNIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2434-2091
Gretchen BjornstadUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4456-787X
Suzy ClarksonBangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3909-7829
Obioha C UkoumunnePenARC, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. o.c.ukoumunne@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0551-9157
Zoe WrigleyUniversity of Cardiff, Cardiff, UK.
Justin MatthewsPenARC, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3743-1627
Vashti BerryPenARC, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6438-3731
Judy HutchingsBangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2562-8104
University of Exeter · GBBangor University · GBCardiff University · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study evaluated the implementation fidelity and effectiveness of KiVa, an evidence-based program that aims to prevent and address bullying in schools, with a particular emphasis on changing the role of bystanders. The study was a two-arm waitlist control cluster randomized controlled trial in which 22 primary schools (clusters) (N = 3214 students aged 7-11) were allocated using a 1:1 ratio to intervention (KiVa; 11 clusters, n = 1588 students) and a waitlist control (usual school provision; 11 clusters, n = 1892 children)). The trial statistician (but not schools or researchers) remained blind to allocation status. The outcomes were as follows: student-reported victimization (primary outcome) and bullying perpetration; teacher-reported child behavior and emotional well-being; and school absenteeism (administrative records). Implementation fidelity was measured using teacher-completed online records (for class lessons) and independent researcher observations (for school-wide elements). Outcome analyses involved 11 intervention schools (n = 1578 children) and 10 control schools (n = 1636 children). There was no statistically significant effect on the primary outcome of child-reported victimization (adjusted intervention/control OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.06; p = 0.11) or on the secondary outcomes. The impact on victimization was not moderated by child gender, age, or victimization status at baseline. Lesson adherence was good but exposure (lesson length) was lower than the recommended amount, and there was considerable variability in the implementation of whole school elements. The trial found insufficient evidence to conclude that KiVa had an effect on the primary outcome. A larger trial of KiVa in the UK is warranted, however, with attention to issues regarding implementation fidelity. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN23999021 Date 10-6-13.

Indexed as

Program EvaluationSchoolsBullyingChildCluster AnalysisEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesWalesBullyingEvidence-based interventionInterventionPreventionRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID32240480
PMCPMC7305088
OpenAlexW3005808719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.