ArticleIrish journal of medical science2020
Establishment of a national surveillance system to monitor community HIV testing, Ireland, 2018.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Scoping Review of Sexual and Gender Minority Health Research in Ireland.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Community-Based Rapid Testing for HIV in Europe and Central Asia: A Narrative Review of Models, Effectiveness, and Implementation Challenges.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- Proposed approaches for public health surveillance: A literature review for the Canadian National HIV Surveillance Program.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHIV continues to be an important public health issue. Voluntary community-based HIV testing (VCBT) helps to reduce the undiagnosed population of HIV-positive individuals, enabling early diagnosis and treatment. Monitoring is essential to determine whether at-risk groups are being effectively reached.
aimsOur aim was to pilot and then introduce sustained monitoring of VCBT in Ireland, through collaboration between statutory and non-statutory organisations.
methodsThe study was initiated by the Health Protection Surveillance Centre in 2018. Steps included forming a multisectoral steering group and developing a minimum standardised dataset. De-identified case-based data were requested for VCBT carried out from 1 January 2017 onwards; this paper includes data for 2018.
resultsSix organisations participated; all four NGOs involved in VCBT, one medical charity, and the Health Service Executive National Social Inclusion Office. Methods were rapid point-of-care testing (POCT) (54%) or laboratory based (46%). Total HIV test reactivity was 1.7% (1.5% excluding persons later identified as previously diagnosed HIV positive). All POCT data were case based; the test reactivity rate was 0.8% and was higher in bar/club settings (1.2%). Most (74%) laboratory testing data were in aggregate format; the test positivity rate in one asylum centre was 5.0%. Ongoing challenges include testing among persons later identified as previously diagnosed HIV positive, monitoring case-based testing in asylum settings, and suboptimal data on confirmatory testing and linkage to care.
conclusionsSustained national monitoring in community settings will help inform HIV testing guidelines and will enable assessment of the impact of local and regional community HIV testing strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.