Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32240364›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2020

Referral Practice for Radioactive Iodine Ablation (RAI) after ATA guidelines 2015: results from a Tertiary Cancer Care Centre.

Harsh Dhar, Shivakumar Thiagarajan, Aamir Yousuf, Supreet Singh Nayyar, Devendra Chaukar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Harsh DharNarayana Superspeciality Hospital, Howrah, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Shivakumar ThiagarajanDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India. drshiva78in@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1957-3338
Aamir YousufDepartment of ENT, Government Medical College, Srinagar, India.
Supreet Singh NayyarDepartment of ENT, Base Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Devendra ChaukarDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · INCommand Hospital · INGovernment Medical College · INNethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe ATA guidelines for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) are one of the most widely referred to. Their 2015 edition proposed a new risk stratification system and modified the indications for radioactive iodine (RAI) ablation especially for the low risk category. We attempted to analyze whether the new guidelines altered referral practices for RAI ablation at our institute. METHODOLOGY: Patients who underwent total or completion thyroidectomy for DTC during 2016-2017 were included. Relevant demographical and pathological data was tabulated. Patients were classified as per the new stratification system and referral practice for RAI ablation documented.

results238 patients were included. Of these 20.6% were low risk, 44.1% were intermediate and 35.3% were high risk as per modified guidelines. All patients within the intermediate and high-risk group and 77.8% of the low risk group were referred for RAI ablation. Analysis of risk factors revealed that within the low risk group there were three patients with < 5 metastatic nodes, all within 3 cm in size-a category that the ATA failed to stratify appropriately. Among those labeled as Intermediate risk due to microscopic extra thyroidal extension (ETE), 85% had no other risk factors and were upstaged solely due to microscopic ETE, which is interestingly no longer included in the TNM staging.

conclusionMajority of low risk patients continue to receive RAI ablation due to persistent belief emanating from literature that remnant ablation improves outcomes and aids in follow up. The issue of RAI ablation for low risk group and prognostic implications of microscopic ETE and limited nodal disease need to be revisited.

Indexed as

IodineThyroid NeoplasmsHumansIodine RadioisotopesReferral and ConsultationThyroidectomyIodineIodine RadioisotopesATA 2015 guidelinesDifferentiated thyroid cancerRadioactive iodine ablationRemnant ablationRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID32240364
OpenAlexW3015005874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.