Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32240196›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Metabolic phenotyping by treatment modality in obese women with gestational diabetes suggests diverse pathophysiology: An exploratory study.

Sara L White, Shahina Begum, Matias C Vieira, Paul Seed, Deborah L Lawlor, Naveed Sattar, Scott M Nelson, Paul Welsh, Dharmintra Pasupathy, Lucilla Poston and 1 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sara L WhiteDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7979-0508
Shahina BegumDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Matias C VieiraDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul SeedDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Deborah L LawlorMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Naveed SattarInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Scott M NelsonSchool of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Paul WelshInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Dharmintra PasupathyDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lucilla PostonDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
UPBEAT Consortium

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZB/A/680Department of Health NF-SI-0166-10196Department of Health NI-SI-0512-10104Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10452Diabetes UK 14/0004849Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/6Medical Research Council MR/ L002477/1Medical Research Council MR/L002477/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeExcess insulin resistance is considered the predominant pathophysiological mechanism in obese women who develop gestational diabetes (GDM). We hypothesised that obese women requiring differing treatment modalities for GDM may have diverse underlying metabolic pathways.

methodsIn this secondary analysis of the UK pregnancies Better Eating and Activity Trial (UPBEAT) we studied women from the control arm with complete biochemical data at three gestational time points; at 15-18+6 and 27-28+6 weeks (before treatment), and 34-36+0 weeks (after treatment). A total of 89 analytes were measured (plasma/serum) using a targeted nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) platform and conventional assays. We used linear regression with appropriate adjustment to model metabolite concentration, stratified by treatment group. MAIN

findings300 women (median BMI 35kg/m2; inter quartile range 32.8-38.2) were studied. 71 developed GDM; 28 received dietary treatment only, 20 metformin, and 23 received insulin. Prior to the initiation of treatment, multiple metabolites differed (p<0.05) between the diet and insulin-treated groups, especially very large density lipoprotein (VLDL) and high density lipoprotein (HDL) subclasses and constituents, with some differences maintained at 34-36 weeks' gestation despite treatment. Gestational lipid profiles of the diet treatment group were indicative of a lower insulin resistance profile, when compared to both insulin-treated women and those without GDM. At 28 weeks' the diet treatment group had lower plasma fasting glucose and insulin than women treated with insulin, yet similar to those without GDM, consistent with a glycaemic mechanism independent of insulin resistance. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationThis exploratory study suggests that GDM pathophysiological processes may differ amongst obese women who require different treatment modalities to achieve glucose control and can be revealed using metabolic profiling.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersBlood GlucoseDiabetes, GestationalDietFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin ResistanceMetforminObesityPregnancyTriglyceridesBiomarkersBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMetforminTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID32240196
PMCPMC7117764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.