Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32240194›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

In Situ Processing and Efficient Environmental Detection (iSPEED) of tree pests and pathogens using point-of-use real-time PCR.

Arnaud Capron, Don Stewart, Kelly Hrywkiw, Kiah Allen, Nicolas Feau, Guillaume Bilodeau, Philippe Tanguay, Michel Cusson, Richard C Hamelin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Establishment of a Visual LAMP Technology and Detection ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Emerging technologies in citizen science and potential for insect monitoring.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Arnaud CapronDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Don StewartNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Québec, Canada.
Kelly HrywkiwDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Kiah AllenDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Nicolas FeauDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Guillaume BilodeauCanadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1766-229X
Philippe TanguayNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Québec, Canada.
Michel CussonNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Québec, Canada.
Richard C HamelinDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4006-532X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global trade and climate change are responsible for a surge in foreign invasive species and emerging pests and pathogens across the world. Early detection and surveillance activities are essential to monitor the environment and prevent or mitigate future ecosystem impacts. Molecular diagnostics by DNA testing has become an integral part of this process. However, for environmental applications, there is a need for cost-effective and efficient point-of-use DNA testing to obtain accurate results from remote sites in real-time. This requires the development of simple and fast sample processing and DNA extraction, room-temperature stable reagents and a portable instrument. We developed a point-of-use real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction system using a crude buffer-based DNA extraction protocol and lyophilized, pre-made, reactions for on-site applications. We demonstrate the use of this approach with pathogens and pests covering a broad spectrum of known undesirable forest enemies: the fungi Sphaerulina musiva, Cronartium ribicola and Cronartium comandrae, the oomycete Phytophthora ramorum and the insect Lymantria dispar. We obtained positive DNA identification from a variety of different tissues, including infected leaves, pathogen spores, or insect legs and antenna. The assays were accurate and yielded no false positive nor negative. The shelf-life of the lyophilized reactions was confirmed after one year at room temperature. Finally, successful tests conducted with portable thermocyclers and disposable instruments demonstrate the suitability of the method, named in Situ Processing and Efficient Environmental Detection (iSPEED), for field testing. This kit fits in a backpack and can be carried to remote locations for accurate and rapid detection of pests and pathogens.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringIntroduced SpeciesClimate ChangeEcosystemForestsFungiHumansPest ControlPolymerase Chain ReactionTrees

Identifiers

PMID32240194
PMCPMC7117680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.