Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32240163›Full record

ReviewPLoS computational biology2020

Multiview learning for understanding functional multiomics.

Nam D Nguyen, Daifeng Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Applications for Deep Learning in Epilepsy Genetic Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Landscape of Tourette's Disorder.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Environmental science & technology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nam D NguyenDepartment of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Daifeng WangDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9190-3704

Funding

Understanding the molecular mechanisms that contribute to neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer DiseaseR01AG067025 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI FINKBEINER, STEVEN M, HAROUTUNIAN, VAHRAM · 2019 to 2023
$11.8M
Discovery and validation of neuronal enhancers as development of psychiatric disorders supplementU01MH116492 · NIMH · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI GERSTEIN, MARK BENDER, WENG, ZHIPING · 2018 to 2023
$6.2M
Waisman Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center Down Syndrome RegistryU54HD090256 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MESSING, ALBEE · 2016 to 2020
$6.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG067025NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090256NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH116492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular mechanisms and functions in complex biological systems currently remain elusive. Recent high-throughput techniques, such as next-generation sequencing, have generated a wide variety of multiomics datasets that enable the identification of biological functions and mechanisms via multiple facets. However, integrating these large-scale multiomics data and discovering functional insights are, nevertheless, challenging tasks. To address these challenges, machine learning has been broadly applied to analyze multiomics. This review introduces multiview learning-an emerging machine learning field-and envisions its potentially powerful applications to multiomics. In particular, multiview learning is more effective than previous integrative methods for learning data's heterogeneity and revealing cross-talk patterns. Although it has been applied to various contexts, such as computer vision and speech recognition, multiview learning has not yet been widely applied to biological data-specifically, multiomics data. Therefore, this paper firstly reviews recent multiview learning methods and unifies them in a framework called multiview empirical risk minimization (MV-ERM). We further discuss the potential applications of each method to multiomics, including genomics, transcriptomics, and epigenomics, in an aim to discover the functional and mechanistic interpretations across omics. Secondly, we explore possible applications to different biological systems, including human diseases (e.g., brain disorders and cancers), plants, and single-cell analysis, and discuss both the benefits and caveats of using multiview learning to discover the molecular mechanisms and functions of these systems.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAlgorithmsAlzheimer DiseaseBrainChlamydomonas reinhardtiiCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyData Interpretation, StatisticalDNAGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMetabolomicsProteomicsSingle-Cell AnalysisSoftwareDNA

Identifiers

PMID32240163
PMCPMC7117667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.