Observational studyJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology2020
Short-term and intermediate-term performance and safety of left bundle branch pacing.
Observational study in Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ventricular activation pattern of left ventricular septal pacing in a canine model.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025Article
- Relationship Between Electrical Parameters and Cardiac Synchrony in Patients Underwent Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2024Article
- Conduction system pacing upgradeFrontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Comparison of the safety and efficiency of temporary cardiac pacing methods during left bundle branch pacemaker implantation: Femoral vein pacing versus atrial spiral pacing with electrodes placed at the ventricle.Clinical cardiology · 2023Article
- Echocardiographic Evaluation of the Effect on Left Ventricular Function Between Left Bundle Branch Pacing and Right Ventricular Pacing.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
- His-Purkinje system pacing reduced tricuspid regurgitation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation after left-sided valve surgery.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Characteristics of intracardiac electrogram of the interventricular septum in the left bundle branch pacing.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Article
- Left ventricular septal pacing versus left bundle branch pacing in the treatment of atrioventricular block.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2022Article
- Initial experience, feasibility and safety of permanent left bundle branch pacing: results from a prospective single-centre study.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2022Article
- The Physiologic Mechanisms of Paced QRS Narrowing During Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Right Bundle Branch Block Patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Criteria for differentiating left bundle branch pacing and left ventricular septal pacing: A systematic review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients: tough road but clear future.Heart failure reviews · 2021Review
- Comparison of Procedure and Fluoroscopy Time Between Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Right Ventricular Pacing for Bradycardia: The Learning Curve for the Novel Pacing Strategy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Remarkable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing in patients with true left bundle branch block.Clinical cardiology · 2020Observational
- Feasibility and stability of left bundle branch pacing in patients after prosthetic valve implantation.Clinical cardiology · 2020Observational
- Short-term and intermediate-term performance and safety of left bundle branch pacing.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLeft bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a promising new method for patients with pacing indications. This study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of LBBP in a relatively longer time span. METHODS AND
resultsA total of 164 patients were recruited for LBBP in this study. Among these patients, 148 patients had pacing indications due to symptomatic bradycardia while the other 16 patients had indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). LBBP was successful in 89.0% (146/164) of all recruited patients. Intracardiac and surface electrographic parameters and image data were documented during the LBBP procedure. The mean paced QRS duration (pQRSD) and the mean stimulus to left ventricular activation time (stim-LVAT) was 106.0 ± 12.9 ms and 64.4 ± 13.7 ms respectively. Left bundle branch (LBB) potentials were recorded in 89 patients. Forty-three of whom had sick sinus syndrome (SSS), and 46 had atrioventricular block (AVB). The presence of LBB potential was more common in patients with SSS (82.7% vs 57.5%, P = .002). No significant differences in pQRSD, stim-LVAT, or capture threshold were detected between patient groups with or without LBB potential. Patients were followed up at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the procedure. Pacing parameters and the echocardiographic data remained stable within a mean follow-up period of 8.6 ± 4.3 months. No serious complication caused by this procedure was found in this study.
conclusionsSuccessful LBBP carried an aspect of short pQRSD and stim-LVAT while the LBB potential was not the prerequisite and necessary feature. The LBBP procedure had a high success rate with satisfied and stable lead parameters during short and intermediate-term observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.