Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32239460›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2020

The effect of individualized, theory-based counselling intervention on active aging and quality of life among older people (the AGNES intervention study).

Taina Rantanen, Mary Hassandra, Katja Pynnönen, Sini Siltanen, Katja Kokko, Laura Karavirta, Markku Kauppinen, Sarianna Sipilä, Milla Saajanaho, Erja Portegijs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Maintenance of high quality of life as an indicator of resilience during COVID-19 social distancing among community-dwelling older adults in Finland.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Taina RantanenFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Gerontology Research Center, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland. taina.rantanen@jyu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1604-1945
Mary HassandraFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Gerontology Research Center, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Katja PynnönenFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Gerontology Research Center, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Sini SiltanenFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Gerontology Research Center, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Katja KokkoFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Gerontology Research Center, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Laura KaravirtaFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Gerontology Research Center, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Markku KauppinenFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Gerontology Research Center, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Sarianna SipiläFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Gerontology Research Center, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Milla SaajanahoFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Gerontology Research Center, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Erja PortegijsFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Gerontology Research Center, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Funding

Academy of Finland 310526H2020 European Research Council 693045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe define active aging as a striving for activities as per one's goals, capacities and opportunities.

aimTo test the 1-year counselling intervention effects on active aging.

methodsIn this two-arm single-blinded randomized controlled trial, the intervention group received individually tailored counselling supporting autonomous motivation for active life (one face-to-face session, four phone calls and supportive written material, n = 101) and the control group written health information (n = 103). Participants were community-dwelling men and women aged 75 or 80 years with intermediate mobility function and without cognitive impairment. The primary outcome was active aging total score measured with the University of Jyväskylä Active Aging Scale (UJACAS, range 0-272, higher values indicate more activity) and secondary outcomes were its subscores for goals, ability, opportunity and activity (range 0-68) and a quality of life (QoL) score. Measures took place at pre-trial, mid-trial (6 months) and post-trial (12 months), except for QoL only pre and post-trial. Data were analyzed with intention-to-treat principles using GEE-models.

resultsThe UJACAS total score increased in the intervention group slightly more than in the control group (group by time p-value = 0.050, effect size 0.011, net benefit 2%), but the group effect was not statistically significant. A small effect was observed for the activity subscore (p = 0.007). DISCUSSION: The individualized counselling supporting autonomous motivation for active life increased the UJACAS score slightly.

conclusionsIt may be possible to promote active aging with individualized counselling, but the effect is small and it is unclear whether the change is meaningful.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overAgingCounselingFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMaleMotivationAgingBehavior changeMobilityQuality of lifeRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID32239460
PMCPMC7532961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.