ReviewJournal of medical systems2020
Transforming Healthcare Cybersecurity from Reactive to Proactive: Current Status and Future Recommendations.
Review in Journal of medical systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vulnerability to Cyberattacks and Sociotechnical Solutions for Health Care Systems: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Influence of Human Factors on Cyber Security within Healthcare Organisations: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Pooled it
- Cybersecurity as it relates to perfusion.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2026Article
- Cybersecurity and Data Protection Practices Among Australian Dermatologists.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2025Article
- Sociotechnical Cybersecurity Framework for Securing Health Care From Vulnerabilities and Cyberattacks: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Review
- Laboratory medicine between technological innovation, rights safeguarding, and patient safety: A bioethical perspective.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Review
- Cybersecurity governance in the healthcare sector during digital transformation: an integrated model and hybrid analytical approach.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Insights into trehalose mediated physiological and biochemical mechanisms in Zea mays L. under chromium stress.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- The need for cybersecurity self-evaluation in healthcare.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Holes in the Armor: Addressing the Gaps in Health Care Cybersecurity in the Philippines and Beyond.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Review
- Article
- Ethical Considerations for Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Radiology: Balancing Innovation and Patient Care.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2023Review
- Cybersecurity in digital healthcare-challenges and potential solutions.Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Role of digital health in pulmonary rehabilitation and beyond: shaping the future.ERJ open research · 2023Article
- Machine learning models for diagnosis and prognosis of Parkinson's disease using brain imaging: general overview, main challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Review
- A qualitative research study of primary care physicians' views of telehealth in delivering postnatal care to women.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Hospital cybersecurity risks and gaps: Review (for the non-cyber professional).Frontiers in digital health · 2022Review
- Healthcare Breaches During COVID-19: The Effect of the Healthcare Entity Type on the Number of Impacted Individuals.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2022Article
- Human Factors in Electronic Health Records Cybersecurity Breach: An Exploratory Analysis.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent rise in cybersecurity breaches in healthcare organizations has put patients' privacy at a higher risk of being exposed. Despite this threat and the additional danger posed by such incidents to patients' safety, as well as operational and financial threats to healthcare organizations, very few studies have systematically examined the cybersecurity threats in healthcare. To lay a firm foundation for healthcare organizations and policymakers in better understanding the complexity of the issue of cybersecurity, this study explores the major type of cybersecurity threats for healthcare organizations and explains the roles of the four major players (cyber attackers, cyber defenders, developers, and end-users) in cybersecurity. Finally, the paper discusses a set of recommendations for the policymakers and healthcare organizations to strengthen cybersecurity in their organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.