ReviewEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020
En bloc resection in patients younger than 16 years affected by primary spine tumors: indications, results and complications in a series of 22 patients.
Review in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- En-bloc spondylectomy in the lumbar spine: indications, results and complications in a series of 47 patients affected by primary malignant bone tumors.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Tumors and infections of the growing spine.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2023Review
- Article
- En bloc resection of huge primary tumors with epidural involvement in the mobile spine using the "rotation-reversion" technique: Feasibility, safety, and clinical outcome of 11 cases.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeReview a series of 22 patients below the age of 16 affected by primary bone tumors of the spine who underwent en bloc resection, and describe the clinical presentation, tumor characteristics, results and complications associated with the surgical treatment, underlining the specific issues related to a younger age.
methodsWe performed a review of all patients < 16 years old affected by primary bone tumors of the spine, surgically treated with en bloc resection from 1996 to 2016. Clinical and radiological characteristics, therapy, complications and survival are reported.
resultsOnly 12/22 cases had not been previously treated. 22.7% experienced at least one early complication; 18.2% and 4.1% experienced at least 2 and ≥ 3 early complications, respectively; 40.9% experienced at least one late complication, often related to hardware failure (27.3%); 18.2% and 4.5% at least 2 and ≥ 3 late complications. No early nor late complications were experienced in 12 out of 22 patients (54.54%). The overall survival and the local recurrence-free survival at 5 years were, respectively, 79.5% and 74.8%; considering only the patients with high-grade tumors, they were 70.9% and 65.5%, respectively. At 77.3 months of median follow-up, 17 patients are still alive, 16 of whom without any evidence of disease and 1 with evidence of local and systemic disease; four patients died with evidence of local disease and one with distant metastases but no local recurrence.
conclusionsYoung people with primary malignant or locally aggressive bone tumors of the spine should be treated in specialized centers, and wide surgery should be performed. The most frequent problems are related to reconstruction in a growing spine and subsequent hardware failure that make later surgeries necessary. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32239356What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.