Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32239323›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2020

[New aspects in the histopathology of infectious skin diseases].

Almut Böer-Auer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Almut Böer-AuerDermatologikum Hamburg, Stephansplatz 5, 20354, Hamburg, Deutschland. boer@dermatologikum.de.
Dermatologikum Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn infectious pathogenesis should always be considered in inflammatory infiltrates in the skin. While some organisms can be recognized on hematoxylin-eosin staining (e.g. yeasts, leishmania), histochemical and immunohistochemical stainings are available for others.

objectivesIf no organisms are seen in a section, the diagnosis of an infection cannot be made with surety, but the pattern of the inflammatory infiltrate can still be suggestive of an infectious process. New or little-known reaction patterns and difficulties in differential diagnosis will be demonstrated. MATERIALS AND

methodsSelective literature review and analysis of individual cases.

resultsStudies using molecular techniques to identify organisms in biopsy specimens have helped to better characterize the histomorphological spectrum of skin infiltrates in infectious skin diseases. Apart from unusual herpes simplex and varicella zoster infections, the histopathology of coxsackie virus and measles exanthem, borreliosis, syphilis, and of cutaneous leishmaniasis is demonstrated. For numerous organisms, molecular tests have been established that can be used on the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material.

conclusionsSelected skin infections demonstrate the broad histomorphological spectrum of skin infiltrates induced by infectious organisms. It is important for histopathologists to know which reaction pattern requires them to alert the clinician to necessary ancillary diagnostics (culture, serology) and when to consider molecular diagnostics to be performed on the biopsy specimen.

Indexed as

Leishmaniasis, CutaneousSkin Diseases, InfectiousDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionSkinBorreliosisCoxsackieLeishmaniasisMeaslesPatternSyphilis

Identifiers

PMID32239323
OpenAlexW3014980723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.